7 sec in total
621 ms
4 sec
2.3 sec
Click here to check amazing CITERE Hypotheses content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about citere.hypotheses.org
Visit citere.hypotheses.orgWe analyzed Citere.hypotheses.org page load time and found that the first response time was 621 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
citere.hypotheses.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.098
90/100
15%
Value9.0 s
34/100
10%
621 ms
299 ms
478 ms
290 ms
290 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Citere.hypotheses.org, 23% (14 requests) were made to Mappemonde.mgm.fr and 12% (7 requests) were made to Static.openedition.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Citere.hypotheses.org.
Page size can be reduced by 600.0 kB (34%)
1.8 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Citere.hypotheses.org main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 160.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CITERE Hypotheses images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 208.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 208.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 167.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Citere.hypotheses.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 167.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (54%)
57
26
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CITERE Hypotheses. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
citere.hypotheses.org
621 ms
style.css
299 ms
style.min.css
478 ms
classic-themes.min.css
290 ms
style.css
290 ms
wp-syntax.css
387 ms
blocks.css
388 ms
signup-password.css
390 ms
wp-featherlight.min.css
400 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
542 ms
main.css
12 ms
wp-about-author.css
481 ms
jquery.min.js
674 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
484 ms
hypoc.js
501 ms
main.js
3 ms
jquery.jsonp-latest.min.js
3 ms
cv-hal.js
474 ms
wp-syntax.js
477 ms
wpFeatherlight.pkgd.min.js
483 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
510 ms
postscribe.min.js
544 ms
complianz.min.js
572 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
560 ms
matomo.js
617 ms
2c6144d2e037edf5da878ec054084b2f
156 ms
trolley.jpg
293 ms
search.png
195 ms
comment-bubble.png
197 ms
La-traduction-comme-dispositif-de-communication-dans-l-Europe-moderne.jpg
281 ms
Capture-d%E2%80%99%C3%A9cran-2020-09-05-%C3%A0-19.28.12-1024x708.png
196 ms
rss.png
266 ms
favicon_18x20.png
281 ms
e60e7014cf00d9e66731c23edcce1009
127 ms
loupe_search_grey.svg
18 ms
tout_openedition.svg
15 ms
fb_off.svg
17 ms
tweet_off.svg
18 ms
295 ms
citere_17.gif
2191 ms
Capture-d%E2%80%99%C3%A9cran-2018-01-04-%C3%A0-16.15.57-300x181.png
103 ms
51DvU-ow7aL._1-212x300.jpg
115 ms
Capture-d%E2%80%99%C3%A9cran-2014-11-24-%C3%A0-21.40.33.png
413 ms
122aval4_1670-1-e1510581262729-700x550.jpg
461 ms
122aval4_1680-2-e1510581240357-700x550.jpg
485 ms
122aval4_1690-3-e1510581222917-700x550.jpg
481 ms
122aval4_1710-5-e1510581185720-700x550.jpg
486 ms
122aval4_1700-4-e1510581207213-700x550.jpg
491 ms
122aval4_1720-6-e1510581169292-700x550.jpg
509 ms
122aval4_1730-7-e1510581144309-700x550.jpg
464 ms
122aval4_1740-8-e1510671101318-700x550.jpg
493 ms
122aval4_1780-12-e1510581054941-700x550.jpg
554 ms
122aval4_1750-9-e1510581108734-700x550.jpg
470 ms
122aval4_1770-11-e1510581074936-700x550.jpg
558 ms
122aval4_1760-10-e1510581091410-700x550.jpg
496 ms
matomo.php
171 ms
matomo.php
431 ms
122aval4_1790-13-e1510671124193-700x550.jpg
554 ms
122aval4_1800-14-e1510580977852-700x550.jpg
594 ms
print.css
105 ms
citere.hypotheses.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
citere.hypotheses.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
citere.hypotheses.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Citere.hypotheses.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Citere.hypotheses.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
citere.hypotheses.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CITERE Hypotheses. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: