2 sec in total
82 ms
1.7 sec
202 ms
Welcome to hagg.ai homepage info - get ready to check Hagg best content right away, or after learning these important things about hagg.ai
Hagg.ai monitors news and online data about Antisemitism and Jewish Security that is collected and categorized by our A.I. technology.
Visit hagg.aiWe analyzed Hagg.ai page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
hagg.ai performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value600 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.055
98/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
82 ms
28 ms
46 ms
46 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Hagg.ai, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (428 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 106.9 kB (70%)
153.6 kB
46.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Hagg.ai main page is 153.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 134.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hagg images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (95%)
63
3
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hagg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.hagg.ai
82 ms
widget.css
28 ms
style.css
46 ms
ae-pro.min.css
46 ms
vegas.min.css
53 ms
style.min.css
39 ms
theme.min.css
112 ms
header-footer.min.css
51 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
64 ms
frontend.min.css
64 ms
swiper.min.css
99 ms
post-291252.css
69 ms
frontend.min.css
71 ms
all.min.css
95 ms
v4-shims.min.css
89 ms
global.css
92 ms
post-97370.css
99 ms
style.min.css
100 ms
font-awesome.min.css
102 ms
ha-97370.css
104 ms
style.css
121 ms
css
86 ms
fontawesome.min.css
107 ms
solid.min.css
114 ms
brands.min.css
125 ms
jquery.min.js
114 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
114 ms
v4-shims.min.js
117 ms
js
120 ms
formreset.min.css
196 ms
formsmain.min.css
253 ms
readyclass.min.css
250 ms
browsers.min.css
251 ms
animations.min.css
259 ms
ae-pro.min.js
271 ms
index.min.js
251 ms
ae-editor.min.js
273 ms
vegas.min.js
271 ms
animated-text.js
273 ms
happy-addons.min.js
267 ms
happy-addons-pro.js
246 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
242 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
239 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
238 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
238 ms
dom-ready.min.js
220 ms
hooks.min.js
221 ms
i18n.min.js
222 ms
a11y.min.js
201 ms
jquery.json.min.js
196 ms
gravityforms.min.js
193 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
196 ms
utils.min.js
193 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
193 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
191 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
185 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
189 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
189 ms
frontend.min.js
181 ms
waypoints.min.js
180 ms
core.min.js
182 ms
frontend.min.js
183 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
178 ms
haggai-logo-black-1024x192.png
99 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
297 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
375 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
420 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
419 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
428 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
428 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
47 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
84 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
45 ms
hagg.ai accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
hagg.ai best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
hagg.ai SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hagg.ai can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hagg.ai main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hagg.ai
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hagg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: