2.7 sec in total
768 ms
1.7 sec
245 ms
Welcome to hairsuite.net homepage info - get ready to check Hair Suite best content right away, or after learning these important things about hairsuite.net
For more than 17 years, our salon has served ladies, gentlemen and children in the Cherry Hill, Haddonfield, Moorestown, and Maple Shade area. Very low pricing.
Visit hairsuite.netWe analyzed Hairsuite.net page load time and found that the first response time was 768 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
hairsuite.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value16.8 s
0/100
25%
Value13.1 s
2/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.262
47/100
15%
Value13.7 s
11/100
10%
768 ms
54 ms
106 ms
24 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Hairsuite.net, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (768 ms) belongs to the original domain Hairsuite.net.
Page size can be reduced by 514.4 kB (18%)
2.8 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Hairsuite.net main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 408.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hair Suite needs image optimization as it can save up to 408.6 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 12.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 24.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hairsuite.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (79%)
71
15
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hair Suite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hairsuite.net
768 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
54 ms
style.min.css
106 ms
css
24 ms
font-awesome.min.css
26 ms
tooltipster.css
103 ms
tooltipster-light.css
107 ms
animations.css
104 ms
styles.css
108 ms
responsive.css
107 ms
settings.css
160 ms
css
21 ms
css
22 ms
css
25 ms
settings.css
157 ms
css
23 ms
fontello.css
160 ms
style.css
172 ms
core.animation.css
162 ms
theme.shortcodes.css
164 ms
plugin.booked.css
215 ms
plugin.instagram-widget.css
211 ms
skin.css
223 ms
custom-style.css
214 ms
responsive.css
216 ms
skin.responsive.css
235 ms
custom.responsive.css
263 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
266 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
269 ms
default.min.css
269 ms
js_composer.min.css
291 ms
jquery.js
284 ms
lightbox.js
332 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
336 ms
jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js
347 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
355 ms
modernizr.min.js
358 ms
css
20 ms
core.messages.min.css
366 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
399 ms
spin.min.js
400 ms
spin.jquery.js
398 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
399 ms
functions.js
399 ms
superfish.js
356 ms
jquery.slidemenu.js
327 ms
core.utils.js
384 ms
core.init.js
381 ms
theme.init.js
380 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
380 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
379 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
329 ms
social-share.js
339 ms
wp-embed.min.js
336 ms
core.messages.js
355 ms
css
39 ms
theme.shortcodes.js
351 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
382 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
349 ms
ds.png
266 ms
12.jpg
328 ms
dsa.jpg
329 ms
dda78adeb9cf6dc91d2a8c440a9e08b1.jpg
357 ms
Hair-Salon-1-358x393.jpg
302 ms
slide0001-3-358x393.jpg
303 ms
image-358x393.jpg
303 ms
68802087.jpg
452 ms
Layer-25-copy1.png
366 ms
font
23 ms
fontello.woff
210 ms
font
23 ms
font
63 ms
font
178 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
120 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
121 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
130 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
134 ms
revicons.woff
54 ms
hairsuite.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hairsuite.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
hairsuite.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hairsuite.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hairsuite.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hairsuite.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hair Suite. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: