Tools & Wizards About Us
handicat.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

handicat.com

Handicat, handicaps et aides techniques

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

273 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

166 ms

handicat.com screenshot

About Website

Visit handicat.com now to see the best up-to-date Handicat content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about handicat.com

Handicat, handicaps et aides techniques. Base de données francaise sur les aides techniques (mat�riel de compensation du handicap moteur,visuel,auditif...) r�f�rencant plus de 10000 produits et ...

Visit handicat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Handicat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

handicat.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

handicat.com

273 ms

handicat.com

689 ms

cookieconsent.js

244 ms

handicat.css

255 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

9 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Handicat.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Cahpp.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 262.5 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Handicat.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 798.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 153.3 kB

  • Original 176.7 kB
  • After minification 104.5 kB
  • After compression 23.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 72.2 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 153.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 34.7 kB

  • Original 798.6 kB
  • After minification 763.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Handicat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 56.7 kB

  • Original 281.2 kB
  • After minification 278.2 kB
  • After compression 224.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 56.7 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 17.9 kB

  • Original 28.9 kB
  • After minification 24.1 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Handicat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.9 kB or 62% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (43%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Handicat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

handicat.com

handicat.com

273 ms

handicat.com

handicat.com

689 ms

cookieconsent.js

cookieconsent.js

244 ms

handicat.css

handicat.css

255 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

9 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

254 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

275 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

368 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

jquery.fancybox-buttons.css

286 ms

jquery.fancybox-buttons.js

jquery.fancybox-buttons.js

328 ms

jquery.fancybox-media.js

jquery.fancybox-media.js

366 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css

366 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

374 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

23 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

34 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

174 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

35 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

414 ms

cse.js

cse.js

59 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

58 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

cse.js

cse.js

89 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

8 ms

collect

collect

104 ms

js

js

105 ms

33117.jpg

33117.jpg

293 ms

logo-conseil2.png

logo-conseil2.png

1510 ms

33059.jpg

33059.jpg

293 ms

33097.jpg

33097.jpg

295 ms

33103.jpg

33103.jpg

296 ms

logo_facebook.png

logo_facebook.png

106 ms

logo_twitter.png

logo_twitter.png

105 ms

logo_instagram.png

logo_instagram.png

106 ms

logo_youtube.png

logo_youtube.png

106 ms

bandeau.jpg

bandeau.jpg

423 ms

puce.png

puce.png

105 ms

Communication.png

Communication.png

200 ms

Domicile.png

Domicile.png

270 ms

Loisirs.png

Loisirs.png

277 ms

Medical.png

Medical.png

277 ms

Mobilite.png

Mobilite.png

343 ms

Quotidien.png

Quotidien.png

285 ms

carsat_nordpicardie.jpg

carsat_nordpicardie.jpg

357 ms

logo-mmh-horizontal.png

logo-mmh-horizontal.png

364 ms

eastin.jpg

eastin.jpg

368 ms

Logo_Ocirp.png

Logo_Ocirp.png

369 ms

cse_element__fr.js

cse_element__fr.js

76 ms

default+fr.css

default+fr.css

103 ms

minimalist.css

minimalist.css

102 ms

33117.jpg

33117.jpg

139 ms

33059.jpg

33059.jpg

314 ms

33097.jpg

33097.jpg

160 ms

33103.jpg

33103.jpg

162 ms

Accessibility Review

handicat.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

handicat.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

handicat.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Handicat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Handicat.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

handicat.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Handicat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: