2.5 sec in total
266 ms
1.4 sec
771 ms
Welcome to hardlight.ma homepage info - get ready to check HARDLIGHT best content right away, or after learning these important things about hardlight.ma
United by our passion to telling creative stories and producing stunning images and videos We created our company to be YOUR creative media partner. Our dedicated employees are happy to assist you wit...
Visit hardlight.maWe analyzed Hardlight.ma page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
hardlight.ma performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value16.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value1,390 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
266 ms
182 ms
72 ms
41 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Hardlight.ma, 16% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 14% (13 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (697 ms) relates to the external source I1.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 149.0 kB (5%)
2.8 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Hardlight.ma main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 131.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 131.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. HARDLIGHT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hardlight.ma has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (52%)
77
37
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HARDLIGHT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hardlight.ma
266 ms
www.hardlight.ma
182 ms
4f4q5.css
72 ms
vqc1.css
41 ms
vqc1.css
53 ms
css
38 ms
css
55 ms
css
60 ms
css
62 ms
css
61 ms
css
62 ms
css
62 ms
css
64 ms
4f4q4.css
54 ms
css
30 ms
css
36 ms
css
35 ms
css
35 ms
css
35 ms
css
35 ms
4f4q4.css
99 ms
vqc1.js
143 ms
api.js
45 ms
api.js
45 ms
css
31 ms
photon.min.js
51 ms
scripts.js
109 ms
lightgallery-all.min.js
109 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
108 ms
tabs.collapse.min.js
108 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
110 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
110 ms
ut.scplugin.min.js
111 ms
gprofiles.js
84 ms
wpgroho.js
110 ms
superfish.min.js
110 ms
ut-init.min.js
117 ms
dflip.min.js
290 ms
wp-embed.min.js
125 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
127 ms
skrollr.min.js
288 ms
jquery.utmasonry.min.js
289 ms
ut.effects.min.js
289 ms
e-202105.js
28 ms
ocp.png
628 ms
masen1.jpg
504 ms
samsung.jpg
568 ms
lafarge.png
572 ms
imgo_1.png
697 ms
logo_oit_organisation_travail.jpg
569 ms
essec.png
627 ms
addictest.png
628 ms
Untitled-2-2.jpg
567 ms
pasta1.jpg
626 ms
marocwebawords.png
626 ms
endeavor.png
626 ms
enactus1.jpg
655 ms
cise1.jpg
656 ms
startup1.jpg
655 ms
CESE.png
625 ms
logo_mc.png
625 ms
reseau-entreprendre-maroc.png
625 ms
ceed1.jpg
615 ms
logo-hardlight.png
116 ms
post-production1-1024x621.jpg
175 ms
overlay-pattern3.png
117 ms
index.php
116 ms
bic.png
694 ms
Egypt.jpg
564 ms
fondation-cheikh-zaid.png
624 ms
apefe.jpg
567 ms
injaz1.jpg
564 ms
cjd1.jpg
623 ms
divider.png
103 ms
slide1.jpg
518 ms
slide4.jpg
510 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
441 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
509 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff
510 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff
510 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff
567 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrc.woff
591 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff
567 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff
591 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
440 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
591 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrc.woff
590 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff
588 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
437 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
418 ms
raleway-medium-webfont.woff
381 ms
brooklyn-default-contact.jpg
509 ms
Brooklyn-Core.ttf
383 ms
slide2.jpg
473 ms
ajax-loader.gif
146 ms
hardlight.ma accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hardlight.ma best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
hardlight.ma SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hardlight.ma can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hardlight.ma main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hardlight.ma
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of HARDLIGHT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: