Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

hardwarereview.net

Contact Support

Page Load Speed

402 ms in total

First Response

57 ms

Resources Loaded

345 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

hardwarereview.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to hardwarereview.net homepage info - get ready to check Hardwarereview best content right away, or after learning these important things about hardwarereview.net

Visit hardwarereview.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Hardwarereview.net page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 345 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hardwarereview.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

hardwarereview.net

57 ms

suspendedpage.cgi

127 ms

iyfhshsp.com

157 ms

iyfhshsp.com

0 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Hardwarereview.net, 50% (2 requests) were made to Iyfhshsp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (157 ms) relates to the external source Iyfhshsp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.6 kB (9%)

Content Size

316.5 kB

After Optimization

287.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Hardwarereview.net main page is 316.5 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 206.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 199 B

  • Original 491 B
  • After minification 423 B
  • After compression 292 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 68 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 199 B or 41% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 12.9 kB

  • Original 206.0 kB
  • After minification 193.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hardwarereview images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 110.0 kB
  • After minification 109.7 kB
  • After compression 94.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

hardwarereview.net accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

hardwarereview.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

hardwarereview.net SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hardwarereview.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Hardwarereview.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hardwarereview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: