4.6 sec in total
350 ms
3.8 sec
447 ms
Click here to check amazing Harper S1980 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about harpers1980.com
Protect your windows & doors during year's hurricane season with Harper’s Protection and Screen Enclosures in Port Charolette! FREE estimate available!
Visit harpers1980.comWe analyzed Harpers1980.com page load time and found that the first response time was 350 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
harpers1980.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value13.1 s
2/100
10%
Value1,000 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.073
96/100
15%
Value13.7 s
11/100
10%
350 ms
69 ms
135 ms
99 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Harpers1980.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Verify.authorize.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (630 ms) belongs to the original domain Harpers1980.com.
Page size can be reduced by 376.7 kB (28%)
1.3 MB
973.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Harpers1980.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 804.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 366.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 366.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Harper S1980 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 367 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (60%)
67
27
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Harper S1980. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
harpers1980.com
350 ms
js
69 ms
js
135 ms
jquery.min.js
99 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
156 ms
core.min.js
211 ms
ultimate.min.js
306 ms
ultimate_bg.min.js
207 ms
seal.js
137 ms
widget.js
172 ms
mouse.min.js
210 ms
resizable.min.js
211 ms
draggable.min.js
207 ms
controlgroup.min.js
259 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
259 ms
button.min.js
260 ms
dialog.min.js
259 ms
wpdialog.min.js
260 ms
frontend.min.js
388 ms
rbtools.min.js
388 ms
rs6.min.js
488 ms
tabs.min.js
381 ms
debouncedresize.min.js
379 ms
magnificpopup.min.js
385 ms
menu.js
388 ms
visible.min.js
388 ms
animations.min.js
479 ms
jplayer.min.js
480 ms
enllax.min.js
483 ms
translate3d.js
483 ms
scripts.js
514 ms
comment-reply.min.js
486 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
515 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
516 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
514 ms
lightbox.min.js
515 ms
vhparallax.min.js
523 ms
swap.js
106 ms
lazyload.min.js
630 ms
js
35 ms
box_shadow.png
311 ms
icons.woff
247 ms
Defaults.woff
307 ms
secure90x72.gif
84 ms
widget_app_base_1707998198539.js
100 ms
prev.png
63 ms
next.png
62 ms
loading.gif
60 ms
close.png
61 ms
harpers-logo-1.png
60 ms
veteran-badge-2-128x177.png
62 ms
hurricanes-overlay.jpg
168 ms
rescreening-overlay.jpg
274 ms
custom-enclosure-overlay.jpg
160 ms
37277222_1080095162141626_7088053772051546112_n-new.jpg
121 ms
38278974_1098151437002665_5268258265967362048_n.jpg
120 ms
IMG_0655-1024x768.jpeg
241 ms
charlotte-county.png
186 ms
punta-gorda.png
200 ms
north-port.png
216 ms
sarasota.png
217 ms
venice.png
239 ms
cape-coral.png
247 ms
map_of_lake_suzy_fl.jpg
279 ms
LAKEWOOD.png
269 ms
BRADENTON.jpg
356 ms
placeholder.png
298 ms
Chamber-Logo-Member-Best1.jpg
299 ms
embed
204 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
297 ms
js
57 ms
harpers1980.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
harpers1980.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
harpers1980.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Harpers1980.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Harpers1980.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
harpers1980.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Harper S1980. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: