Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

harpersigns.co.uk

Harper Signs for manufacturer, supplier, installation of restaurants, leisure, hospitality, corporate and retail businesses, local and large scale

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

364 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

harpersigns.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Harper Signs content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about harpersigns.co.uk

We are a sign manufacturer supplying and installing signage solutions for restaurants, leisure, hospitality, corporate and retail businesses on a local and global scale.

Visit harpersigns.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Harpersigns.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 364 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

harpersigns.co.uk performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.553

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

harpersigns.co.uk

364 ms

www.harpersigns.co.uk

760 ms

line-awesome.min.css

52 ms

stylesheet.min.css

303 ms

js

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Harpersigns.co.uk, 11% (4 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (825 ms) belongs to the original domain Harpersigns.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 168.8 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Harpersigns.co.uk main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 113.0 kB

  • Original 143.3 kB
  • After minification 135.2 kB
  • After compression 30.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 32.7 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Harper Signs images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 115.4 kB
  • After minification 115.4 kB
  • After compression 109.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 50.3 kB
  • After minification 50.3 kB
  • After compression 33.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Harpersigns.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.8 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (47%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Harper Signs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

harpersigns.co.uk accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

harpersigns.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

harpersigns.co.uk SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Harpersigns.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Harpersigns.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Harper Signs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: