Tools & Wizards About Us
harpgear.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

harpgear.net

Anna Christensen,Robert Webster,Appassionata,Giglights,Harp Strings,Harpsichords,Pickups,Early Music Strings

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

274 ms

Resources Loaded

707 ms

Page Rendered

76 ms

harpgear.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to harpgear.net homepage info - get ready to check Harp Gear best content right away, or after learning these important things about harpgear.net

Anna Christensen,Appassionata,Giglight, Music Stand Light, Harp Strings,Robert Webster,Harpsichords,Pickups,Early Music Strings

Visit harpgear.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Harpgear.net page load time and found that the first response time was 274 ms and then it took 783 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

harpgear.net performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.045

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

harpgear.net

274 ms

harpgear.css

90 ms

counter.php

51 ms

pixfiller.gif

89 ms

masthead_harp.png

342 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Harpgear.net, 10% (1 request) were made to Amazingcounters.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Jigsaw.w3.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (342 ms) belongs to the original domain Harpgear.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 82.8 kB (61%)

Content Size

135.7 kB

After Optimization

53.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Harpgear.net main page is 135.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 120.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 3.5 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 70.7 kB

  • Original 120.9 kB
  • After minification 50.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Harp Gear needs image optimization as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 58% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Harpgear.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Harp Gear. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

harpgear.net

harpgear.net

274 ms

harpgear.css

harpgear.css

90 ms

counter.php

counter.php

51 ms

pixfiller.gif

pixfiller.gif

89 ms

masthead_harp.png

masthead_harp.png

342 ms

masthead_harpgear_text.png

masthead_harpgear_text.png

175 ms

index_anna_christensen.png

index_anna_christensen.png

258 ms

index_services.png

index_services.png

259 ms

vcss-blue

vcss-blue

137 ms

valid-xhtml10-blue

valid-xhtml10-blue

79 ms

Accessibility Review

harpgear.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

harpgear.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

harpgear.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Harpgear.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Harpgear.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

harpgear.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Harp Gear. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: