Tools & Wizards About Us
harym.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

harym.com

harym.com

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

375 ms

Resources Loaded

455 ms

Page Rendered

193 ms

harym.com screenshot

About Website

Visit harym.com now to see the best up-to-date Harym content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about harym.com

This domain may be for sale!

Visit harym.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Harym.com page load time and found that the first response time was 375 ms and then it took 648 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

harym.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,040 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.197

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

harym.com

375 ms

caf.js

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Harym.com, 50% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (375 ms) belongs to the original domain Harym.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 27.7 kB (29%)

Content Size

94.9 kB

After Optimization

67.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Harym.com main page is 94.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 52.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 42.5 kB
  • After minification 41.6 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 123 B

  • Original 52.5 kB
  • After minification 52.5 kB
  • After compression 52.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Harym. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

harym.com

harym.com

375 ms

caf.js

caf.js

36 ms

Accessibility Review

harym.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

harym.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

harym.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Harym.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Harym.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

harym.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Harym. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: