10.6 sec in total
4.3 sec
6.1 sec
194 ms
Welcome to hdil.in homepage info - get ready to check HDIL best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about hdil.in
Visit hdil.inWe analyzed Hdil.in page load time and found that the first response time was 4.3 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
hdil.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value18.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value1,180 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value19.1 s
3/100
10%
4300 ms
117 ms
82 ms
115 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Hdil.in, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Hdil.in.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (71%)
3.0 MB
860.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Hdil.in main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. HDIL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 771.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 771.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hdil.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (77%)
73
17
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HDIL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hdil.in
4300 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
117 ms
styles.css
82 ms
style.css
115 ms
common.css
101 ms
editor_form.css
116 ms
formcraft.css
165 ms
settings.css
166 ms
style.css
222 ms
my_media.css
180 ms
prettyPhoto.css
185 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
186 ms
css
25 ms
font-awesome.min.css
243 ms
js_composer_front_custom.css
296 ms
ultimate.min.css
354 ms
Defaults.css
258 ms
jquery.js
318 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
318 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
390 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
392 ms
bootstrap.min.js
390 ms
modernizr.custom.62456.js
390 ms
ultimate.min.js
462 ms
jquery-ui.css
431 ms
emicalc.css
452 ms
core.min.js
455 ms
widget.min.js
458 ms
mouse.min.js
456 ms
draggable.min.js
510 ms
position.min.js
533 ms
menu.min.js
532 ms
autocomplete.min.js
534 ms
slider.min.js
535 ms
jquery.prettyphoto.js
482 ms
placeholders.min.js
527 ms
retina-1.1.0.js
549 ms
jsapi
61 ms
datepicker.min.js
557 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
550 ms
control.js
522 ms
ajaxcalls.js
524 ms
comment-reply.min.js
564 ms
js_composer_front.js
589 ms
combined-js.js
587 ms
sortable.min.js
548 ms
form.js
533 ms
form_only.js
530 ms
jquery.fileupload.min.js
574 ms
bootstrap.css
603 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
549 ms
jquery.iframe-transport.min.js
537 ms
osemicode.js
483 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
664 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
666 ms
ditty-news-ticker.js
596 ms
logo.gif
107 ms
dummy.png
106 ms
Banners-01-265x163.jpg
168 ms
whispering_towers_overview-265x163.jpg
169 ms
premier_exotica_overview-265x163.jpg
168 ms
hdil-residency-park-ii_2015-07-30_02-55-14.266_16671437544733_capture-265x163.png
527 ms
Banners-01-261x225.jpg
210 ms
item-on-hover.png
98 ms
unit.png
139 ms
icon_bed1.png
140 ms
icon_bath1.png
140 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
35 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTY3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
94 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSo3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
95 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
485 ms
26 ms
ui+en.css
3 ms
format+en,default+en,ui+en,corechart+en.I.js
20 ms
large_left.png
55 ms
large_right.png
81 ms
loader_4.gif
81 ms
BG-WEB-1.jpg
318 ms
hdil.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hdil.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
hdil.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hdil.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hdil.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hdil.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of HDIL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: