7.6 sec in total
211 ms
7.1 sec
363 ms
Visit hebisa.com now to see the best up-to-date Hebisa content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hebisa.com
Tecnobisa es una empresa perteneciente al grupo hebisa dedicada a la compra venta de maquinaria vinculada al sector metalúrgico.
Visit hebisa.comWe analyzed Hebisa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 211 ms and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
hebisa.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value20.7 s
0/100
25%
Value16.0 s
0/100
10%
Value4,060 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.694
7/100
15%
Value19.5 s
2/100
10%
211 ms
142 ms
1240 ms
1247 ms
1571 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Hebisa.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Hebisa.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (58%)
2.1 MB
869.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Hebisa.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 891.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hebisa images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 614.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 614.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 508.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hebisa.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 508.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (85%)
75
11
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hebisa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hebisa.com
211 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
142 ms
parallax.css
1240 ms
font-awesome.css
1247 ms
style.css
1571 ms
bootstrap.css
1547 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
1101 ms
styles.css
1479 ms
ml-responsive-table.css
1462 ms
mtphr-tabs.css
1458 ms
styles.css
1453 ms
style.css
1512 ms
ley-cookie.css
1536 ms
admin-ajax.php
3907 ms
css
23 ms
wpgmza_style.css
1536 ms
jquery.js
1836 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1604 ms
parallax.js
1606 ms
modernizr.js
1740 ms
carousel.js
1625 ms
tipsy.js
1650 ms
fields.js
1647 ms
jquery.scroll.pack.js
1736 ms
supersubs.js
1681 ms
superfish.js
1746 ms
hoverIntent.js
1742 ms
buttons.js
1778 ms
ddslick.js
1778 ms
js
39 ms
bootstrap.js
2050 ms
ml.noconflict.js
1830 ms
ml.responsive.table.min.js
1832 ms
cookie-check.js
1818 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1858 ms
tabs.js
1861 ms
main.js
1864 ms
gmap.js
1866 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1897 ms
scripts.js
1768 ms
respond.min.js
819 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
684 ms
wp-embed.min.js
706 ms
reset.css
435 ms
shadow.png
67 ms
pattern_8.png
1707 ms
logosuperior.png
354 ms
list-style.png
414 ms
trans.png
149 ms
menu-item.png
349 ms
menu-item-after.png
354 ms
euromac2.jpg
454 ms
tecoi1.jpg
536 ms
3.jpg
536 ms
lissmac1.jpg
576 ms
left-ar.png
577 ms
right-ar.png
580 ms
comment.png
725 ms
gracias2015-300x164.jpg
753 ms
icon-category.png
635 ms
stx1-287x300.jpg
817 ms
icon-tag.png
635 ms
expotec2015-1441032762.jpg
2887 ms
widget-shadow.png
730 ms
search.png
761 ms
ga.js
24 ms
btop.png
741 ms
O7Sg97byXU4
368 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
309 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
840 ms
__utm.gif
215 ms
common.js
221 ms
util.js
240 ms
geocoder.js
220 ms
glyphicons-197-circle-exclamation-mark.png
472 ms
glyphicons-208-remove-2.png
473 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
56 ms
www-embed-player.js
81 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
56 ms
ad_status.js
58 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
97 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
100 ms
hebisa.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hebisa.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
hebisa.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hebisa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hebisa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hebisa.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hebisa. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: