Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

hegram.com

ファクタリングの実用性をご紹介 – 知れば知る程とても便利なことが分かる

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

109 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

382 ms

hegram.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hegram content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hegram.com

araba Tag Search,Photos,Photo,instagram,profile on Instagram Profile. Pictures, likes, comments, followers and more. Click here to see profile. |Hegram.Com

Visit hegram.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hegram.com page load time and found that the first response time was 109 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hegram.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value29.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.323

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hegram.com

109 ms

araba

916 ms

bootstrap.min.css

7 ms

css

26 ms

enjoygram-7815e8c7daf3affd2dae0f53d3fc179f.css

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Hegram.com, 39% (32 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com and 27% (22 requests) were made to Twemoji.maxcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Hegram.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 511.8 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

816.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Hegram.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 619.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 109.9 kB

  • Original 124.1 kB
  • After minification 118.6 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 619.2 kB
  • After minification 615.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hegram images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 178.9 kB

  • Original 319.9 kB
  • After minification 319.7 kB
  • After compression 141.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 178.9 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 219.6 kB

  • Original 264.7 kB
  • After minification 263.6 kB
  • After compression 45.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hegram.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 219.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (53%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hegram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

hegram.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

hegram.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

hegram.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    TR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hegram.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Turkish language. Our system also found out that Hegram.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hegram. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: