Tools & Wizards About Us
hexamail.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

hexamail.com

Hexamail — Email Security, Server & Archiving

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

197 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

166 ms

hexamail.com screenshot

About Website

Visit hexamail.com now to see the best up-to-date Hexamail content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hexamail.com

Hexamail email cloud monitoring, on-premises email server products and the Hexamail Flow desktop email client. Free trials and support.

Visit hexamail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hexamail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 197 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hexamail.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value920 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hexamail.com

197 ms

hexamail.com

385 ms

www.hexamail.com

784 ms

js

79 ms

hexamailguard_splash.webp

116 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Hexamail.com, 35% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (784 ms) belongs to the original domain Hexamail.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 463.6 kB (58%)

Content Size

795.7 kB

After Optimization

332.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Hexamail.com main page is 795.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 609.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 439.9 kB

  • Original 609.5 kB
  • After minification 600.1 kB
  • After compression 169.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 439.9 kB or 72% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 186.2 kB
  • After minification 186.2 kB
  • After compression 162.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (41%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hexamail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hexamail.com

hexamail.com

197 ms

hexamail.com

hexamail.com

385 ms

www.hexamail.com

www.hexamail.com

784 ms

js

js

79 ms

hexamailguard_splash.webp

hexamailguard_splash.webp

116 ms

hexamailpop3downloader_splash.webp

hexamailpop3downloader_splash.webp

195 ms

hexamailflow_splash.webp

hexamailflow_splash.webp

286 ms

hexamailnexus_splash.webp

hexamailnexus_splash.webp

377 ms

hexamailvault_splash.webp

hexamailvault_splash.webp

289 ms

hexamailserver_splash.webp

hexamailserver_splash.webp

288 ms

49644_thumb.webp

49644_thumb.webp

289 ms

32911_thumb.webp

32911_thumb.webp

289 ms

35779_thumb.webp

35779_thumb.webp

377 ms

21050_thumb.webp

21050_thumb.webp

378 ms

48714_thumb.webp

48714_thumb.webp

378 ms

54344_thumb.webp

54344_thumb.webp

379 ms

42787_thumb.webp

42787_thumb.webp

380 ms

63766_thumb.webp

63766_thumb.webp

468 ms

26085_thumb.webp

26085_thumb.webp

467 ms

37908_thumb.webp

37908_thumb.webp

469 ms

48978_thumb.webp

48978_thumb.webp

470 ms

56263_thumb.webp

56263_thumb.webp

473 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

456 ms

bat.js

bat.js

41 ms

1f5vn3r9t

1f5vn3r9t

219 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

167 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

177 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

167 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

69 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

66 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

207 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

118 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

157 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

278 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

319 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

212 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

178 ms

Accessibility Review

hexamail.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">

Best Practices

hexamail.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

hexamail.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hexamail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hexamail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hexamail.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hexamail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: