3.3 sec in total
411 ms
2.6 sec
310 ms
Visit hogrefe-testsystem.com now to see the best up-to-date Hogrefe Testsystem content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hogrefe-testsystem.com
Visit hogrefe-testsystem.comWe analyzed Hogrefe-testsystem.com page load time and found that the first response time was 411 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
hogrefe-testsystem.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value4.9 s
29/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
411 ms
575 ms
604 ms
608 ms
611 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Hogrefe-testsystem.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Etracker.de and 2% (1 request) were made to Code.etracker.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (958 ms) belongs to the original domain Hogrefe-testsystem.com.
Page size can be reduced by 419.3 kB (31%)
1.3 MB
913.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Hogrefe-testsystem.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 929.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 116.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hogrefe Testsystem needs image optimization as it can save up to 116.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 226.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 226.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hogrefe-testsystem.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (56%)
48
21
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hogrefe Testsystem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hogrefe-testsystem.com
411 ms
reset.css
575 ms
layout.css
604 ms
style.css
608 ms
stylesheet_96424a467d.css
611 ms
wt-lightbox.css
618 ms
fr_htstests_style.css
621 ms
tooltipster.css
675 ms
language.css
705 ms
rebranding.css
708 ms
jquery-1.10.x-1.10.x.js
958 ms
jquery.ddslick.min.js
721 ms
index.js
722 ms
javascript_93077bb238.js
773 ms
wt-lightbox.css
807 ms
thumb-scroller.css
810 ms
jquery.wt-lightbox.js
824 ms
jquery.thumb-scroller.min.js
826 ms
jquery.wt-lightbox.min.js
875 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
910 ms
fr_htstests_index.js
912 ms
hogrefe-logo.png
106 ms
search-dark.png
105 ms
Internet_Testen_Test_09.jpg
319 ms
Internet_Testen_Ergebnisse_2_01.png
533 ms
Internet_Testen_anonymes_Testen_2_01.png
420 ms
Lokale_Installation_Durchfuehrungswahl_2_01.png
427 ms
Lokale_Installation_Programmsprache_06.jpg
406 ms
Lokales_Testen_Journal_06.jpg
420 ms
Online_Portal_Testvorbereitung_2_01.png
537 ms
Online_Portal_E-Mail-Benachrichtigung_06.jpg
729 ms
BIP-6F_Profilvergleich-1_09.png
730 ms
BIP-6F_Profilvergleich-2_09.png
532 ms
Ranking3_klein_10.jpg
731 ms
Ranking4_klein_10.jpg
730 ms
external-link-grey.png
718 ms
t.js
549 ms
cnt_js.php
561 ms
cntcc
558 ms
de_DE.png
127 ms
en.png
124 ms
at.png
129 ms
ch.png
130 ms
nl.png
128 ms
da.png
126 ms
spacer.png
223 ms
lb-assets.png
226 ms
loader.gif
226 ms
scroller-assets.png
228 ms
hogrefe-testsystem.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
hogrefe-testsystem.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
hogrefe-testsystem.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hogrefe-testsystem.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hogrefe-testsystem.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hogrefe-testsystem.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hogrefe Testsystem. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: