Tools & Wizards About Us
homeguard.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

homeguard.com

California Home Inspections - HomeGuard

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

126 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

341 ms

homeguard.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to homeguard.com homepage info - get ready to check Home Guard best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about homeguard.com

HomeGuard Inc. home inspections, termite inspections, roof inspections, natural hazard disclosure reports, and repairs give homeowners and realtors resources.

Visit homeguard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Homeguard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

homeguard.com performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value32.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,330 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.424

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value36.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

homeguard.com

126 ms

homeguard.com

163 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

62 ms

script.js

88 ms

js

130 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Homeguard.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (532 ms) relates to the external source Log.cookieyes.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (27%)

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Homeguard.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 90.4 kB

  • Original 113.1 kB
  • After minification 100.3 kB
  • After compression 22.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 99.5 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Home Guard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 416.1 kB

  • Original 790.8 kB
  • After minification 770.5 kB
  • After compression 374.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 416.1 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 769.6 kB

  • Original 991.5 kB
  • After minification 952.6 kB
  • After compression 221.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Homeguard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 769.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (55%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

33

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Home Guard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

homeguard.com

homeguard.com

126 ms

homeguard.com

homeguard.com

163 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

62 ms

script.js

script.js

88 ms

js

js

130 ms

46wqz.css

46wqz.css

43 ms

46wqz.css

46wqz.css

171 ms

46wqz.css

46wqz.css

130 ms

css

css

129 ms

46wqz.css

46wqz.css

224 ms

all.css

all.css

130 ms

46wqz.css

46wqz.css

137 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

136 ms

46wqz.css

46wqz.css

185 ms

46wqz.js

46wqz.js

178 ms

46wqz.js

46wqz.js

178 ms

46wqz.css

46wqz.css

202 ms

js

js

139 ms

jquery.cycle2.js

jquery.cycle2.js

200 ms

element.js

element.js

127 ms

index.js

index.js

203 ms

index.js

index.js

204 ms

stickThis.js

stickThis.js

214 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

393 ms

pum-site-scripts.js

pum-site-scripts.js

394 ms

api.js

api.js

124 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

394 ms

index.js

index.js

395 ms

e-202429.js

e-202429.js

72 ms

masterslider.min.js

masterslider.min.js

396 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

394 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

141 ms

log

log

532 ms

css

css

17 ms

HomeGuard-northern-california-home-inspectors.gif

HomeGuard-northern-california-home-inspectors.gif

109 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

107 ms

home-inspector-northern-california.gif

home-inspector-northern-california.gif

108 ms

northern-california-termite-inspection.gif

northern-california-termite-inspection.gif

109 ms

northern-california-roof-inspection-company.gif

northern-california-roof-inspection-company.gif

108 ms

iphone.png

iphone.png

107 ms

Sewer-Logo-1.jpg

Sewer-Logo-1.jpg

109 ms

pool-inspection-v2.png

pool-inspection-v2.png

110 ms

Natural-Hazard-Disclosure-Reports-Northern-California.gif

Natural-Hazard-Disclosure-Reports-Northern-California.gif

110 ms

android.png

android.png

111 ms

backtotop.png

backtotop.png

142 ms

home-inspection-company-california-logo.jpg

home-inspection-company-california-logo.jpg

142 ms

ashi-logo-lg-2-1.png

ashi-logo-lg-2-1.png

141 ms

CAR_Certified_Home_Inspector_Badge_CAR_Final-01-2-2.png

CAR_Certified_Home_Inspector_Badge_CAR_Final-01-2-2.png

141 ms

California-State-Contractors-Board-Logo-1.png

California-State-Contractors-Board-Logo-1.png

140 ms

Structural-Pest-Control-Board-Logo-1.jpg

Structural-Pest-Control-Board-Logo-1.jpg

141 ms

home-inspections-la-jolla.jpg

home-inspections-la-jolla.jpg

297 ms

FF-Logo-Stack.jpg

FF-Logo-Stack.jpg

298 ms

homeguard-homewarranty-home-protection-plan.jpg

homeguard-homewarranty-home-protection-plan.jpg

298 ms

COMMON-HOME-ROOFING-PROBLEMS-3.png

COMMON-HOME-ROOFING-PROBLEMS-3.png

354 ms

the-real-cost-of-termites-2.png

the-real-cost-of-termites-2.png

352 ms

asB1v5Lbhyg

asB1v5Lbhyg

360 ms

btn-red-bg-x.jpg

btn-red-bg-x.jpg

197 ms

bg1.jpg

bg1.jpg

249 ms

gradiant-bg-x.jpg

gradiant-bg-x.jpg

250 ms

trans-bg.png

trans-bg.png

250 ms

btn-blue-bg-x.jpg

btn-blue-bg-x.jpg

250 ms

btn-red-bg-lgx.jpg

btn-red-bg-lgx.jpg

256 ms

bg2.jpg

bg2.jpg

255 ms

quotes.png

quotes.png

255 ms

star.png

star.png

254 ms

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

248 ms

OpenSans-Semibold.ttf

OpenSans-Semibold.ttf

350 ms

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

349 ms

OpenSans-ExtraBold.ttf

OpenSans-ExtraBold.ttf

349 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

187 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

240 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

241 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

241 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

347 ms

OpenSans-CondLightItalic.ttf

OpenSans-CondLightItalic.ttf

348 ms

OpenSans-CondBold.ttf

OpenSans-CondBold.ttf

349 ms

OpenSans-CondLight.ttf

OpenSans-CondLight.ttf

515 ms

OpenSans-Italic.ttf

OpenSans-Italic.ttf

459 ms

BodoniMTBold.ttf

BodoniMTBold.ttf

458 ms

loading-2.gif

loading-2.gif

322 ms

slide-nav.png

slide-nav.png

272 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

274 ms

230 ms

pixel

pixel

1 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

76 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

143 ms

base.js

base.js

173 ms

280 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

251 ms

homeguard-slide-4-update2-Mar22.png

homeguard-slide-4-update2-Mar22.png

209 ms

G9IHigwxVH3Mn3WnChzJeeVNQhz-kZ0Q5G-GviBI-tI.js

G9IHigwxVH3Mn3WnChzJeeVNQhz-kZ0Q5G-GviBI-tI.js

127 ms

embed.js

embed.js

72 ms

id

id

68 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

40 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

152 ms

Accessibility Review

homeguard.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

homeguard.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

homeguard.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Homeguard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Homeguard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

homeguard.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Home Guard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: