Tools & Wizards About Us
hopeafterloss.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

hopeafterloss.org

Home | Hope After Loss

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

167 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

77 ms

hopeafterloss.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hope After Loss content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hopeafterloss.org

Hope After Loss: Pregnancy and Infant Loss Support Groups & Services for bereaved parents, family, friends and professionals.

Visit hopeafterloss.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Hopeafterloss.org page load time and found that the first response time was 167 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hopeafterloss.org performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.hopeafterloss.org

167 ms

minified.js

75 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

73 ms

polyfill.min.js

124 ms

7444.chunk.min.js

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hopeafterloss.org, 45% (27 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 28% (17 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (654 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 821.1 kB (59%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

567.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Hopeafterloss.org main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 978.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 794.7 kB

  • Original 978.6 kB
  • After minification 976.9 kB
  • After compression 184.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 794.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 22.2 kB

  • Original 139.6 kB
  • After minification 117.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hope After Loss needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 270.8 kB
  • After minification 270.8 kB
  • After compression 266.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (39%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hope After Loss. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.hopeafterloss.org

www.hopeafterloss.org

167 ms

minified.js

minified.js

75 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

73 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

124 ms

7444.chunk.min.js

7444.chunk.min.js

118 ms

4261.chunk.min.js

4261.chunk.min.js

72 ms

576.chunk.min.js

576.chunk.min.js

115 ms

Cards.chunk.min.js

Cards.chunk.min.js

117 ms

thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.8add2233.bundle.min.js

75 ms

main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js

main.1550a9c2.bundle.min.js

76 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

72 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

192 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

190 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

193 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

189 ms

Hope%20White%20PNG.png

Hope%20White%20PNG.png

378 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

229 ms

958515_2d636fe5c02844b8b6ec2d3387bb95de~mv2.png

958515_2d636fe5c02844b8b6ec2d3387bb95de~mv2.png

340 ms

1.png

1.png

257 ms

2.png

2.png

294 ms

3.png

3.png

286 ms

4.png

4.png

305 ms

958515_3cf995eb46ae4c89af933d4c483fa97c~mv2.png

958515_3cf995eb46ae4c89af933d4c483fa97c~mv2.png

436 ms

958515_156cff3867d2441fa4350af3f34d6a32~mv2.png

958515_156cff3867d2441fa4350af3f34d6a32~mv2.png

470 ms

958515_6a8e31fe7f3641a8b6093aab9ba6e008~mv2.png

958515_6a8e31fe7f3641a8b6093aab9ba6e008~mv2.png

488 ms

958515_696ca4eabc5d4d1f925a113e2f38558c~mv2.png

958515_696ca4eabc5d4d1f925a113e2f38558c~mv2.png

476 ms

958515_0ea89a5c31634bb7ad24d86d4f5fe079~mv2.png

958515_0ea89a5c31634bb7ad24d86d4f5fe079~mv2.png

488 ms

958515_a42e61a381e240bc9a03f26fc7b46629~mv2.png

958515_a42e61a381e240bc9a03f26fc7b46629~mv2.png

482 ms

b2009e_83307f07e3be4d388dd4d30365a398fc~mv2.jpg

b2009e_83307f07e3be4d388dd4d30365a398fc~mv2.jpg

630 ms

Untitled%20design%20(3).png

Untitled%20design%20(3).png

654 ms

958515_8894ae7c67c745ef96d355c2e39a5f63~mv2.png

958515_8894ae7c67c745ef96d355c2e39a5f63~mv2.png

613 ms

logo%20(2).webp

logo%20(2).webp

651 ms

958515_2d636fe5c02844b8b6ec2d3387bb95de~mv2.png

958515_2d636fe5c02844b8b6ec2d3387bb95de~mv2.png

630 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

49 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

13 ms

opensans-italic-webfont.woff

opensans-italic-webfont.woff

48 ms

opensans-bolditalic-webfont.woff

opensans-bolditalic-webfont.woff

50 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

13 ms

p0A1C4_gK5NzKtuGSwNurQ.woff

p0A1C4_gK5NzKtuGSwNurQ.woff

11 ms

h3r77AwDsldr1E_2g4qqGBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

h3r77AwDsldr1E_2g4qqGBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

49 ms

-GlaWpWcSgdVagNuOGuFKRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

-GlaWpWcSgdVagNuOGuFKRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff

50 ms

Fm41upUVp7KTKUZhL0PfQT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

Fm41upUVp7KTKUZhL0PfQT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

51 ms

9VWMTeb5jtXkNoTv949NpRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

9VWMTeb5jtXkNoTv949NpRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

51 ms

aDjpMND83pDErGXlVEr-SRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

aDjpMND83pDErGXlVEr-SRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

52 ms

111 ms

112 ms

108 ms

108 ms

104 ms

102 ms

147 ms

145 ms

142 ms

141 ms

143 ms

139 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

8 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

27 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

8 ms

Accessibility Review

hopeafterloss.org accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

hopeafterloss.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

hopeafterloss.org SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hopeafterloss.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hopeafterloss.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hopeafterloss.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hope After Loss. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: