Tools & Wizards About Us
hotelspicker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

hotelspicker.com

万博体育直播-万博体育高清直播-万博2018世界杯直播

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

776 ms

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

209 ms

hotelspicker.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hotelspicker content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hotelspicker.com

万博体育直播最新官网被评为亚洲第一在线娱乐平台,万博体育直播为用户们提供亚洲最精彩的游戏,万博体育高清直播致力于做做好的娱乐游戏平台,万博2018世界杯直播是一家综合的娱乐平台,包括在线体育、快乐彩、老虎机、真人娱乐城,加入我们,更多的优惠大奖等您来拿,还能够在万博体育直播官方网站里面看到很多有用的技巧与最新娱乐体验。

Visit hotelspicker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hotelspicker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 776 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hotelspicker.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.hotelspicker.com

776 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

547 ms

style.css

739 ms

dashicons.min.css

1042 ms

css

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Hotelspicker.com, 24% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Hotelspicker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 704.0 kB (26%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hotelspicker.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 11.1 kB
  • After minification 11.1 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 527.5 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hotelspicker needs image optimization as it can save up to 527.5 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 125.9 kB

  • Original 191.8 kB
  • After minification 191.7 kB
  • After compression 65.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.9 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 42.7 kB

  • Original 76.0 kB
  • After minification 66.0 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hotelspicker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 56% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (36%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hotelspicker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.hotelspicker.com

www.hotelspicker.com

776 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

547 ms

style.css

style.css

739 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

1042 ms

css

css

26 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1248 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

559 ms

effects.js

effects.js

609 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

805 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

43 ms

cropped-logo-1.png

cropped-logo-1.png

286 ms

Taj-Exotica-Goa-800x450.png

Taj-Exotica-Goa-800x450.png

2242 ms

The-Taj-Mahal-Palace-Mumbai-782x450.png

The-Taj-Mahal-Palace-Mumbai-782x450.png

2459 ms

The-Taj-Mahal-Hotel-Delhi.png

The-Taj-Mahal-Hotel-Delhi.png

1520 ms

RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

21 ms

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf

22 ms

4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf

4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf

24 ms

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

24 ms

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

22 ms

collect

collect

22 ms

6nvU963vW96zvuZHXyGvkNfLa8try2vLa8try2vLa8try2vLaPbzi90vRj6IfRT+KfhS9KHpR9KLoRdGLohdFL4peFL0oelH0ouhF0YuiF0Uvil4UvSh6UfSi6EXRi6IXRS+KXhS9KHpR9KHoQ9GHog9FH4o+FD0oelD0oOToN3TgiAFDRg4b9C8VmLmgAAAAAVWwJZkAAA==

6nvU963vW96zvuZHXyGvkNfLa8try2vLa8try2vLa8try2vLaPbzi90vRj6IfRT+KfhS9KHpR9KLoRdGLohdFL4peFL0oelH0ouhF0YuiF0Uvil4UvSh6UfSi6EXRi6IXRS+KXhS9KHpR9KHoQ9GHog9FH4o+FD0oelD0oOToN3TgiAFDRg4b9C8VmLmgAAAAAVWwJZkAAA==

3 ms

SEO Factors

hotelspicker.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hotelspicker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Hotelspicker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hotelspicker.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hotelspicker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: