Tools & Wizards About Us
housekeep.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

housekeep.com

Try London's Best House Cleaners | Domestic Cleaning Service | Housekeep.com

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

907 ms

housekeep.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Housekeep content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about housekeep.com

Find a house cleaner near you now. Book a one-off, weekly or fortnightly home clean from just £18.50 per hour. London's best domestic cleaning service.

Visit housekeep.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Housekeep.com page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

housekeep.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

housekeep.com

108 ms

housekeep.com

478 ms

alpine.js

23 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

24 ms

marketing.min.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Housekeep.com, 73% (53 requests) were made to D17x34b9fcvxk7.cloudfront.net and 7% (5 requests) were made to Housekeep-worker.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source D17x34b9fcvxk7.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 157.8 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Housekeep.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 104.9 kB

  • Original 127.3 kB
  • After minification 107.2 kB
  • After compression 22.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 52.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Housekeep images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 85 B

  • Original 23.4 kB
  • After minification 23.4 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (27%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

49

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Housekeep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

housekeep.com

housekeep.com

108 ms

housekeep.com

housekeep.com

478 ms

alpine.js

alpine.js

23 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

24 ms

marketing.min.css

marketing.min.css

31 ms

marketing.min.js

marketing.min.js

88 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

354 ms

j.php

j.php

314 ms

30b5779d2b6be8094e0a6453137617ff.jpeg.100x100_q85_crop-smart.jpg

30b5779d2b6be8094e0a6453137617ff.jpeg.100x100_q85_crop-smart.jpg

837 ms

close.svg

close.svg

278 ms

making-bed.jpg

making-bed.jpg

751 ms

logo__the-guardian.svg

logo__the-guardian.svg

348 ms

logo__the-times-2.svg

logo__the-times-2.svg

282 ms

logo__ct-awards.svg

logo__ct-awards.svg

279 ms

match.png

match.png

936 ms

manage.png

manage.png

751 ms

marvel.png

marvel.png

843 ms

ab5ca1bf97253e331d20.png

ab5ca1bf97253e331d20.png

308 ms

kitchen.jpg

kitchen.jpg

901 ms

bathroom.jpg

bathroom.jpg

1001 ms

living-areas.jpg

living-areas.jpg

1057 ms

bedroom.jpg

bedroom.jpg

1158 ms

iphone-extra-tasks.png

iphone-extra-tasks.png

854 ms

window-washer.svg

window-washer.svg

858 ms

picture-dewonker.svg

picture-dewonker.svg

862 ms

housekeeper-sheet-shaker-without-sheet.svg

housekeeper-sheet-shaker-without-sheet.svg

865 ms

dust-buster.svg

dust-buster.svg

886 ms

010002063db2efafebd6.png

010002063db2efafebd6.png

888 ms

bf6d286b28fc80c4ce4d.png

bf6d286b28fc80c4ce4d.png

889 ms

spray-bottle.svg

spray-bottle.svg

892 ms

mop-bucket.svg

mop-bucket.svg

894 ms

sponge.svg

sponge.svg

897 ms

sofa.svg

sofa.svg

904 ms

house.svg

house.svg

901 ms

carpet-rolled.svg

carpet-rolled.svg

905 ms

plunger.svg

plunger.svg

908 ms

light-bulb.svg

light-bulb.svg

907 ms

saw.svg

saw.svg

911 ms

wrench.svg

wrench.svg

912 ms

paint-roller.svg

paint-roller.svg

913 ms

shovel.svg

shovel.svg

916 ms

cardboard-box.svg

cardboard-box.svg

915 ms

washing-machine.svg

washing-machine.svg

918 ms

dd3fd38a17bb0860292404bb3303217c.png.100x100_q85_crop-smart.png

dd3fd38a17bb0860292404bb3303217c.png.100x100_q85_crop-smart.png

850 ms

b57c3a4976b794ea487ad94f6a961111.jpeg.100x100_q85_crop-smart.jpg

b57c3a4976b794ea487ad94f6a961111.jpeg.100x100_q85_crop-smart.jpg

824 ms

f30fca718390ccb2f7f2d2365c67c528.png.100x100_q85_crop-smart.png

f30fca718390ccb2f7f2d2365c67c528.png.100x100_q85_crop-smart.png

832 ms

48544e6974d1da8db58d2778b547807b.jpeg.100x100_q85_crop-smart.png

48544e6974d1da8db58d2778b547807b.jpeg.100x100_q85_crop-smart.png

841 ms

6b13bf4726dbe6ef9e69.woff

6b13bf4726dbe6ef9e69.woff

926 ms

2664e29c1f2388ccab48.woff

2664e29c1f2388ccab48.woff

668 ms

2a1dbd388e2cd04e61d3.woff

2a1dbd388e2cd04e61d3.woff

665 ms

82b1212e45a2bc35dd73.woff

82b1212e45a2bc35dd73.woff

658 ms

bin.svg

bin.svg

629 ms

padlock-open.svg

padlock-open.svg

630 ms

js

js

83 ms

destination

destination

308 ms

28271.js

28271.js

71 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

29 ms

bat.js

bat.js

303 ms

pipe.svg

pipe.svg

557 ms

776506442496601

776506442496601

300 ms

4012708.js

4012708.js

68 ms

51 ms

radiator.svg

radiator.svg

190 ms

hard-hat.svg

hard-hat.svg

192 ms

29 ms

document-ticks.svg

document-ticks.svg

98 ms

google-play-store.svg

google-play-store.svg

429 ms

ab871c63af88c2e62b08.svg

ab871c63af88c2e62b08.svg

121 ms

visa.png

visa.png

115 ms

mastercard.png

mastercard.png

114 ms

amex.png

amex.png

92 ms

25bb38b9f5b7b6f81f54.svg

25bb38b9f5b7b6f81f54.svg

94 ms

6e83b5c89dcf6725f31c.svg

6e83b5c89dcf6725f31c.svg

94 ms

Accessibility Review

housekeep.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

housekeep.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

housekeep.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Housekeep.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Housekeep.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

housekeep.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Housekeep. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: