Tools & Wizards About Us
housekeeper.care screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

housekeeper.care

Personnal Care : Maid

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

1.9 sec

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

162 ms

housekeeper.care screenshot

About Website

Visit housekeeper.care now to see the best up-to-date Housekeeper content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about housekeeper.care

personnal care, maid, housekeeping, pet care

Visit housekeeper.care

Key Findings

We analyzed Housekeeper.care page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

housekeeper.care performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

housekeeper.care

1871 ms

css

26 ms

css

211 ms

flags

168 ms

adsbygoogle.js

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Housekeeper.care, 14% (5 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 14% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Housekeeper.care.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 303.5 kB (54%)

Content Size

566.7 kB

After Optimization

263.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Housekeeper.care main page is 566.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 493.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 22.1 kB
  • After minification 18.6 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 50.8 kB
  • After minification 48.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Housekeeper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 284.5 kB

  • Original 493.8 kB
  • After minification 493.7 kB
  • After compression 209.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 284.5 kB or 58% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (44%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Housekeeper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

housekeeper.care

housekeeper.care

1871 ms

css

css

26 ms

css

css

211 ms

flags

flags

168 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

5 ms

jquery

jquery

492 ms

js

js

372 ms

bootstrap

bootstrap

260 ms

js

js

49 ms

ca-pub-4420187193510992.js

ca-pub-4420187193510992.js

35 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

45 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

62 ms

150x150_de8812ec-d7d8-4e5a-898c-a7101c01244e.jpg

150x150_de8812ec-d7d8-4e5a-898c-a7101c01244e.jpg

122 ms

150x150_49b74e60-9dea-41e3-8bff-0526c7067bf1.jpg

150x150_49b74e60-9dea-41e3-8bff-0526c7067bf1.jpg

120 ms

150x150_no_photo.png

150x150_no_photo.png

120 ms

150x150_2eb7f2e4-736f-40be-a52c-4ff31c016e70.jpg

150x150_2eb7f2e4-736f-40be-a52c-4ff31c016e70.jpg

183 ms

150x150_d1ea5217-f11c-415a-a3f1-b82b9fc9277f.jpg

150x150_d1ea5217-f11c-415a-a3f1-b82b9fc9277f.jpg

190 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

200 ms

ads

ads

401 ms

osd.js

osd.js

6 ms

ads

ads

390 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

20 ms

common.js

common.js

27 ms

util.js

util.js

45 ms

controls.js

controls.js

27 ms

places_impl.js

places_impl.js

27 ms

collect

collect

20 ms

2383955539286809126

2383955539286809126

31 ms

abg.js

abg.js

32 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

37 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

30 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

55 ms

favicon

favicon

67 ms

s

s

36 ms

nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png

nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png

27 ms

SEO Factors

housekeeper.care SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Housekeeper.care can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Housekeeper.care main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

housekeeper.care

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Housekeeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: