3.5 sec in total
206 ms
2.6 sec
688 ms
Visit hoverboardfaq.com now to see the best up-to-date Hover Board FAQ content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hoverboardfaq.com
Hoverboards, monorovers, self balancing scooters, whatever name you call them this is the place to discuss them, review them, and more.
Visit hoverboardfaq.comWe analyzed Hoverboardfaq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
hoverboardfaq.com performance score
206 ms
70 ms
47 ms
114 ms
207 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hoverboardfaq.com, 22% (16 requests) were made to Blogger.com and 16% (12 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (969 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 549.1 kB (63%)
870.8 kB
321.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Hoverboardfaq.com main page is 870.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 521.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 231 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 231 B or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 386 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hover Board FAQ images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 265.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 265.9 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 282.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hoverboardfaq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 282.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (55%)
69
31
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hover Board FAQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hoverboardfaq.com
206 ms
hoverboardfaq.blogspot.com
70 ms
3416767676-css_bundle_v2.css
47 ms
adsbygoogle.js
114 ms
plusone.js
207 ms
2872693907-widgets.js
113 ms
analytics.js
201 ms
gradients_light.png
200 ms
Hundreds%2Bof%2BDollars.png
199 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
242 ms
blog-post-reactions.g
183 ms
q
290 ms
q
261 ms
ad.png
182 ms
share_buttons_20_3.png
154 ms
logo-16.png
139 ms
icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
204 ms
show_ads_impl.js
250 ms
zrt_lookup.html
211 ms
329596758-rx.js
88 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
95 ms
collect
185 ms
aggregates
291 ms
aggregates
300 ms
aggregates
288 ms
aggregates
287 ms
aggregates
336 ms
aggregates
334 ms
checks_sprite.png
78 ms
lazy.min.js
288 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
48 ms
120x240.gif
260 ms
a-logo-amazon.png
146 ms
json
228 ms
41GTRdlfKHL._AC_AC_SR98,95_.jpg
253 ms
cart.gif
202 ms
aggregates
302 ms
cookie.js
282 ms
integrator.js
282 ms
ads
969 ms
osd.js
230 ms
ads
941 ms
ads
922 ms
9rFyNHGOk-w
339 ms
Rbd0NUgRXic
289 ms
IZrCt1X-mSc
240 ms
fmSK-zWRmqA
138 ms
ZLC7_vWLteY
133 ms
shHTRMMxrqc
242 ms
8dKaW5Ep-ak
595 ms
authorization.css
48 ms
authorization.css
47 ms
www-player.css
11 ms
www-embed-player.js
93 ms
base.js
129 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
126 ms
ad_status.js
432 ms
embed.js
83 ms
15121477076043986586
221 ms
abg_lite.js
220 ms
window_focus.js
258 ms
osd_listener.js
146 ms
qs_click_protection.js
397 ms
one_click_handler_one_afma.js
402 ms
6608573980037713209
399 ms
id
134 ms
id
134 ms
s
177 ms
redir.html
317 ms
36t2pzUCsky2p8StOfRDuZ2SQrRQGkwFUvrIpVyovYo.js
278 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
266 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
268 ms
iframe.html
169 ms
activeview
159 ms
hoverboardfaq.com SEO score
![]()
EN
![]()
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hoverboardfaq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hoverboardfaq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hoverboardfaq.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hover Board FAQ. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: