1.4 sec in total
172 ms
756 ms
476 ms
Visit hoverpost.com now to see the best up-to-date Hoverpost content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hoverpost.com
All your brand's key social stats in one weekly email.
Visit hoverpost.comWe analyzed Hoverpost.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
hoverpost.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value2.7 s
96/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
172 ms
286 ms
38 ms
34 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hoverpost.com, 56% (24 requests) were made to Peakfeed.com and 14% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (286 ms) relates to the external source Peakfeed.com.
Page size can be reduced by 152.3 kB (29%)
519.5 kB
367.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Hoverpost.com main page is 519.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 280.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hoverpost images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 32% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hoverpost.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 101.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (44%)
34
19
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hoverpost. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hoverpost.com
172 ms
peakfeed.com
286 ms
bootstrap.min.css
38 ms
css
34 ms
css
55 ms
sample.php
202 ms
logo-white.png
124 ms
martinojerian.jpg
121 ms
logogrid.png
152 ms
screenstack.png
152 ms
macbookair.png
197 ms
snapshot.png
204 ms
shireeodiz.jpg
170 ms
patrickmaloney.jpg
198 ms
johnmitchell.jpg
199 ms
iansmith.jpg
206 ms
rIfXJDWe_400x400.jpg
166 ms
jquery.min.js
55 ms
bootstrap.min.js
22 ms
le-0.7.js
209 ms
stevebarkoczy.jpg
238 ms
logoback.png
225 ms
backer.jpg
234 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
14 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
17 ms
css
50 ms
css
63 ms
logo-dark.png
132 ms
up.jpg
125 ms
down.jpg
127 ms
facebook.jpg
135 ms
same.jpg
145 ms
google.jpg
144 ms
instagram.jpg
144 ms
twitter.jpg
145 ms
youtube.jpg
165 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
2NBgzUtEeyB-Xtpr9bm1CS3oLLXpsuqWJ5lOsXwE8Dk.ttf
34 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
34 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
39 ms
2NBgzUtEeyB-Xtpr9bm1CS3oLLXpsuqWJ5lOsXwE8Dk.ttf
24 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
33 ms
collect
18 ms
hoverpost.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
hoverpost.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
hoverpost.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hoverpost.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Hoverpost.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
hoverpost.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hoverpost. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: