1.2 sec in total
30 ms
872 ms
302 ms
Welcome to html.design homepage info - get ready to check Html best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about html.design
html.design is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, html.design has it all. We hope you find wha...
Visit html.designWe analyzed Html.design page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
html.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value4.5 s
72/100
10%
Value1,240 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.051
99/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
30 ms
359 ms
19 ms
45 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Html.design, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (359 ms) belongs to the original domain Html.design.
Page size can be reduced by 185.9 kB (10%)
1.9 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Html.design main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 162.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Html images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 21.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Html.design has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (83%)
89
15
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Html. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
html.design
30 ms
html.design
359 ms
wpp.min.js
19 ms
wpapp-styles.css
45 ms
style.min.css
37 ms
shoppable-images-front.min.css
31 ms
mashsb.min.css
23 ms
youtube.min.css
30 ms
gallery.min.css
41 ms
magnific-popup.css
48 ms
snax.min.css
41 ms
main.min.css
48 ms
wpp.css
50 ms
all-light.min.css
52 ms
single-light.min.css
61 ms
comments-light.min.css
78 ms
dynamic-style-1722862002.css
79 ms
js_composer.min.css
64 ms
snax-extra-light.min.css
82 ms
dlm-light.min.css
81 ms
vc-light.min.css
80 ms
mashshare-light.min.css
84 ms
front.css
90 ms
jquery.min.js
83 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
82 ms
slot-slideup.js
83 ms
shoppable-images-front.js
85 ms
coupons.js
84 ms
redirect_method.js
108 ms
mashsb.min.js
107 ms
modernizr-custom.min.js
107 ms
front.min.js
106 ms
js
62 ms
css
36 ms
screen-basic.min.css
151 ms
snapcode.min.css
152 ms
youtube.js
152 ms
lazysizes.min.js
165 ms
ls.unveilhooks.min.js
180 ms
gallery.js
167 ms
collections.min.js
182 ms
api.js
150 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
52 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
177 ms
jquery.timeago.js
181 ms
jquery.timeago.en.js
181 ms
front.js
178 ms
front.js
172 ms
dlm-xhr.min.js
256 ms
shares.min.js
169 ms
comment-reply.min.js
249 ms
stickyfill.min.js
249 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
247 ms
matchmedia.js
236 ms
matchmedia.addlistener.js
234 ms
picturefill.min.js
224 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
222 ms
enquire.min.js
220 ms
global.js
220 ms
libgif.js
271 ms
players.js
218 ms
core.min.js
273 ms
menu.min.js
271 ms
dom-ready.min.js
271 ms
hooks.min.js
270 ms
i18n.min.js
271 ms
a11y.min.js
269 ms
autocomplete.min.js
249 ms
ajax-search.js
249 ms
single.js
249 ms
default
326 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
182 ms
index.js
180 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
180 ms
back-to-top.js
169 ms
forms.js
167 ms
elegantthemes-900x120-1.jpg
168 ms
logo-html-design-2.png
154 ms
468x60.gif
153 ms
dynamic-style-1722862002.css
152 ms
lifesure-400x500.png
87 ms
lions-400x500.png
86 ms
lifestyle-400x500.png
90 ms
kingrice-400x500.png
87 ms
joy_seno-400x500.png
85 ms
jko-400x500.png
86 ms
jazzy-400x500.png
87 ms
electricca-1-400x500.png
88 ms
enopro-1-400x500.png
89 ms
greenscape-1-400x500.png
88 ms
g1-socials.woff
23 ms
bimber.woff
22 ms
zOL64pLDlL1D99S8g8PtiKchq-dmiw.woff
76 ms
recaptcha__en.js
83 ms
html.design accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
html.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
html.design SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Html.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Html.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
html.design
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Html. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: