895 ms in total
92 ms
745 ms
58 ms
Visit human-works.org now to see the best up-to-date Human Works content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about human-works.org
Visit human-works.orgWe analyzed Human-works.org page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 803 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
human-works.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value18.2 s
0/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value2,940 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value27.2 s
0/100
10%
92 ms
38 ms
38 ms
70 ms
108 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Human-works.org, 51% (20 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (483 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 595.7 kB (57%)
1.0 MB
442.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Human-works.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 674.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 547.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 547.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 453 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Human Works images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (69%)
26
8
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Human Works. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.human-works.org
92 ms
minified.js
38 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
38 ms
polyfill.min.js
70 ms
1679.chunk.min.js
108 ms
5431.chunk.min.js
68 ms
2701.chunk.min.js
109 ms
5721.chunk.min.js
109 ms
8529.chunk.min.js
111 ms
ListLayout.chunk.min.js
109 ms
8875.e26292eb.bundle.min.js
108 ms
thunderbolt-commons.b7a35b00.bundle.min.js
95 ms
main.d98de0fd.bundle.min.js
97 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
96 ms
lodash.min.js
100 ms
react.production.min.js
97 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
100 ms
browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js
99 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
111 ms
Human-Works-Foundation-Logo-Color.png
214 ms
bundle.min.js
58 ms
fdd067_8a541c7ac2e34a478b69f25560384293f000.jpg
483 ms
84770f_6d8f65290fd8480282082b66ac697efa~mv2_d_8688_5792_s_4_2.jpeg
51 ms
104 ms
99 ms
96 ms
98 ms
98 ms
102 ms
135 ms
134 ms
135 ms
138 ms
136 ms
134 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
4 ms
bolt-performance
19 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
5 ms
human-works.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
human-works.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
human-works.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Human-works.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Human-works.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
human-works.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Human Works. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: