5.1 sec in total
42 ms
4.3 sec
814 ms
Click here to check amazing HUMANS content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about humans.net
Biz HUMANS’da barcha kerakli xizmatlarni bitta ilovada birlashtirdik, barchasi siz osonroq aloqada qolishingiz uchun, ba’zilarini esa bepul ham qilib qo’ydik.
Visit humans.netWe analyzed Humans.net page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
humans.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value3.3 s
70/100
25%
Value16.0 s
0/100
10%
Value8,180 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value31.5 s
0/100
10%
42 ms
420 ms
424 ms
107 ms
202 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Humans.net, 7% (5 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 7% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 310.1 kB (36%)
860.8 kB
550.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Humans.net main page is 860.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 370.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 301.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 301.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. HUMANS images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (69%)
61
19
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HUMANS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
humans.net
42 ms
humans.net
420 ms
gtm.js
424 ms
styles-20d15bea7a97381b6cec.css
107 ms
mapbox-gl.css
202 ms
80d9c2bab8d450c018ffed1d23b8a267.svg
347 ms
4dc19c4e69d4a7af213445c6d9154981.svg
347 ms
manifest.main-db9f41a7276e7fc7190b.js
331 ms
styles-a84824421ef02b5ef4bd.js
331 ms
config-29c5a8924cfc012cd397.js
332 ms
main-4486211f7f6621723316.js
628 ms
mapbox-gl.js
359 ms
adsbygoogle.js
629 ms
dc03b8e90e25ac5ead42587e54d8c7ac.png
424 ms
642b30c5bdaaa4b463442ef9c089454b.woff
418 ms
notfound
589 ms
notfound
579 ms
dbe4e73442f982aaccf5fc9045459370.woff
285 ms
449ae6ae7141f294f253ea4cc43e2e90.woff
286 ms
all.js
542 ms
optimize.js
417 ms
optimize.js
485 ms
analytics.js
695 ms
v7nz1l7k.js
462 ms
provesrc.js
501 ms
insight.min.js
497 ms
pixel
453 ms
fbevents.js
233 ms
munchkin.js
676 ms
js
233 ms
bat.js
487 ms
tag.js
1194 ms
fb37b475e83317f79ebba77b6.js
672 ms
show_ads_impl.js
280 ms
zrt_lookup.html
550 ms
asset_composer.js
561 ms
all.js
195 ms
1934149553540545
329 ms
conversion_async.js
456 ms
v7nz1l7k.json
228 ms
398 ms
25043121.js
164 ms
cookie.js
287 ms
integrator.js
282 ms
ads
185 ms
linkid.js
112 ms
munchkin.js
141 ms
288078351589128
122 ms
25043121
165 ms
humansnet.zendesk.com
304 ms
collect
103 ms
collect
127 ms
104 ms
visitWebPage
854 ms
configuration
63 ms
ga-audiences
26 ms
clarity.js
12 ms
30 ms
css
37 ms
web-widget-framework-96c2ac7dafdad68c4a30.js
50 ms
402 ms
advert.gif
488 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
128 ms
sodar
121 ms
sodar2.js
97 ms
configuration
73 ms
runner.html
224 ms
aframe
227 ms
1
240 ms
c.gif
122 ms
YrdBSjzfIHcYhYLmavhSyO_EhBrLUWpx5ykdL7H9Kqg.js
18 ms
humans.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
humans.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
humans.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
UZ
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Humans.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Uzbek is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Humans.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
humans.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of HUMANS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: