1.5 sec in total
238 ms
1.1 sec
160 ms
Visit hydroline.com now to see the best up-to-date Hydroline content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hydroline.com
Moving Boxes Menu with jQuery
Visit hydroline.comWe analyzed Hydroline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 238 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
hydroline.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value180 ms
92/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.9 s
44/100
10%
238 ms
110 ms
36 ms
49 ms
113 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Hydroline.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (448 ms) belongs to the original domain Hydroline.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (73%)
1.5 MB
420.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Hydroline.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 768.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hydroline needs image optimization as it can save up to 768.9 kB or 74% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 322.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 322.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hydroline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (16%)
67
56
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hydroline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hydroline.com
238 ms
style.css
110 ms
css
36 ms
css
49 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.css
113 ms
jquery-1.4.min.js
224 ms
jquery.js
224 ms
jquery.min.js
297 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
115 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
115 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.min.js
173 ms
jquery.transform-0.9.3.min_.js
172 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
448 ms
reset.css
173 ms
bg.jpg
262 ms
random.php
78 ms
IFR2.jpg
63 ms
IFR3.jpg
69 ms
SE.jpg
67 ms
TFR3.jpg
117 ms
TIF2.jpg
116 ms
FIF.jpg
119 ms
CFR.jpg
260 ms
HFR.jpg
257 ms
KIF.jpg
257 ms
TIFP%2004.jpg
253 ms
RPF.jpg
257 ms
SPF.jpg
258 ms
JFR1.jpg
254 ms
GR.jpg
259 ms
JFRB.jpg
260 ms
RFPB.jpg
274 ms
FSB.jpg
283 ms
TB.jpg
282 ms
DBT.jpg
284 ms
AB.jpg
285 ms
ABT.jpg
295 ms
FSBA.jpg
331 ms
ABP.jpg
340 ms
MBF.jpg
340 ms
FSBP.jpg
338 ms
SC2.jpg
342 ms
SC2M.jpg
352 ms
SC3.jpg
389 ms
SE.jpg
394 ms
TMA.jpg
395 ms
TMH.jpg
396 ms
TMS.jpg
392 ms
TMSU.jpg
379 ms
DIFFUSERS.jpg
390 ms
TMAD.jpg
396 ms
TMSD.jpg
395 ms
TMSUD.jpg
389 ms
MT.jpg
354 ms
TWF.jpg
360 ms
SWF.jpg
396 ms
GMT.jpg
263 ms
LG2.jpg
262 ms
LG6.jpg
263 ms
SGA.jpg
268 ms
SGP.jpg
274 ms
CUT.jpg
312 ms
VALVES.jpg
315 ms
Plt_difr.jpg
315 ms
tank_1.jpg
314 ms
tank_4.jpg
318 ms
pattern.png
325 ms
random.php
350 ms
hydroline.com accessibility score
hydroline.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
hydroline.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hydroline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hydroline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hydroline.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hydroline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: