Tools & Wizards About Us
i-review.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

i-review.net

Unternehmen bewerten & Erfahrungen lesen | Trusteeper

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

166 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

233 ms

i-review.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to i-review.net homepage info - get ready to check I Review best content right away, or after learning these important things about i-review.net

Trusteeper ist eine unabhängige deutsche Bewertungsplattform, auf der Verbraucher echte Erfahrungen mit Unternehmen, Online-Shops und Dienstleistern teilen und lesen können. Mehr Transparenz, Vertraue...

Visit i-review.net

Key Findings

We analyzed I-review.net page load time and found that the first response time was 166 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

i-review.net performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

i-review.net

166 ms

i-review.net

340 ms

style.css

69 ms

slidingpanel.css

133 ms

dynamiccomparison.css

188 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original I-review.net, 18% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (577 ms) belongs to the original domain I-review.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 160.9 kB (37%)

Content Size

439.8 kB

After Optimization

278.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of I-review.net main page is 439.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 193.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 109.6 kB

  • Original 131.3 kB
  • After minification 120.8 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 45.0 kB
  • After minification 41.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. I Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 70.5 kB
  • After minification 70.5 kB
  • After compression 60.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 37.3 kB

  • Original 193.0 kB
  • After minification 193.0 kB
  • After compression 155.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. I-review.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.3 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (87%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of I Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

i-review.net

i-review.net

166 ms

i-review.net

i-review.net

340 ms

style.css

style.css

69 ms

slidingpanel.css

slidingpanel.css

133 ms

dynamiccomparison.css

dynamiccomparison.css

188 ms

bdt-uikit.css

bdt-uikit.css

250 ms

ep-helper.css

ep-helper.css

190 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

259 ms

eggrehub.css

eggrehub.css

195 ms

iconstyle.css

iconstyle.css

192 ms

elementor.css

elementor.css

254 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

255 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

257 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

260 ms

post-22.css

post-22.css

311 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

437 ms

post-4464.css

post-4464.css

315 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

319 ms

css

css

47 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

325 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

325 ms

price_alert.js

price_alert.js

372 ms

filterpanel.css

filterpanel.css

374 ms

mailchimp.css

mailchimp.css

379 ms

tablechart.js

tablechart.js

390 ms

comparechart.js

comparechart.js

432 ms

inview.js

inview.js

567 ms

pgwmodal.js

pgwmodal.js

567 ms

unveil.js

unveil.js

567 ms

hoverintent.js

hoverintent.js

567 ms

countdown.js

countdown.js

568 ms

custom.js

custom.js

568 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

568 ms

filterpanel.js

filterpanel.js

568 ms

ajaxpagination.js

ajaxpagination.js

577 ms

wishcount.js

wishcount.js

577 ms

hotcount.js

hotcount.js

577 ms

289908e3df93a5d4c54ef6d172e57a0f

289908e3df93a5d4c54ef6d172e57a0f

87 ms

LOGO_hsgs.png

LOGO_hsgs.png

163 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

163 ms

rhicons.ttf

rhicons.ttf

149 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjg.woff

57 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjg.woff

57 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZ9hjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZ9hjg.woff

86 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZ9hjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZ9hjg.woff

101 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZ9hjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZ9hjg.woff

103 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjg.woff

102 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjg.woff

101 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZ9hjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZ9hjg.woff

102 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZ9hjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZ9hjg.woff

102 ms

Accessibility Review

i-review.net accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

i-review.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

i-review.net SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise I-review.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that I-review.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

i-review.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of I Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: