4.5 sec in total
424 ms
3.9 sec
153 ms
Visit i-views.de now to see the best up-to-date I Views content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about i-views.de
Das Softwareunternehmen für Content- und Wissensmanagement mit dem Schwerpunkt „Smart Information Management“.
Visit i-views.deWe analyzed I-views.de page load time and found that the first response time was 424 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
i-views.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value4.6 s
70/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.29
41/100
15%
Value5.2 s
74/100
10%
424 ms
99 ms
193 ms
194 ms
205 ms
Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (120 requests) were addressed to the original I-views.de, 3% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (891 ms) belongs to the original domain I-views.de.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (60%)
2.0 MB
801.7 kB
In fact, the total size of I-views.de main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. I Views images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 837.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 837.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 277.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. I-views.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 277.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 105 (83%)
127
22
The browser has sent 127 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of I Views. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 81 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
424 ms
font-awesome.css
99 ms
style.css
193 ms
at-jp-styles.css
194 ms
widgetkit.css
205 ms
style.css
199 ms
style.css
199 ms
style.css
204 ms
style.css
284 ms
style.css
289 ms
style.css
290 ms
style.css
291 ms
style.css
301 ms
style.css
296 ms
style.css
374 ms
style.css
385 ms
style.css
380 ms
style.css
382 ms
style.css
391 ms
style.css
397 ms
lightbox.css
465 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
473 ms
style.css
471 ms
style.css
477 ms
style.css
483 ms
style.css
494 ms
style.css
556 ms
style.css
563 ms
style.css
563 ms
style.css
571 ms
style.css
574 ms
style.css
590 ms
style.css
645 ms
style.css
652 ms
style.css
651 ms
style.css
660 ms
addthis_widget.js
10 ms
style.css
657 ms
style.css
599 ms
style.css
556 ms
style.css
563 ms
style.css
557 ms
style.css
573 ms
style.css
568 ms
style.css
592 ms
style.css
557 ms
style.css
557 ms
style.css
558 ms
style.css
576 ms
style.css
568 ms
style.css
592 ms
style.css
556 ms
style.css
557 ms
style.css
558 ms
style.css
575 ms
style.css
571 ms
style.css
593 ms
style.css
556 ms
style.css
555 ms
style.css
557 ms
style.css
573 ms
style.css
574 ms
style.css
594 ms
style.css
556 ms
style.css
558 ms
style.css
557 ms
style.css
572 ms
style.css
577 ms
style.css
594 ms
style.css
557 ms
style.css
557 ms
style.css
557 ms
style.css
570 ms
spotlight.css
578 ms
style.css
596 ms
jcemediabox.css
558 ms
style.css
557 ms
template.css
556 ms
system.css
567 ms
general.css
579 ms
template.css
600 ms
custom.css
557 ms
mootools-core.js
656 ms
core.js
556 ms
caption.js
568 ms
script.js
579 ms
mootools-more.js
810 ms
jquery.js
668 ms
jquery.plugins.js
558 ms
responsive.js
599 ms
accordion.js
582 ms
lazyloader.js
626 ms
lazyloader.js
606 ms
lazyloader.js
599 ms
lazyloader.js
606 ms
twitter.js
650 ms
jcemediabox.js
640 ms
jquery.js
891 ms
script.js
858 ms
lightbox.js
148 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
152 ms
spotlight.js
159 ms
system.css
98 ms
analytics.js
503 ms
page.jpeg
502 ms
header.jpg
497 ms
object1730813984.png
499 ms
object1414586997.png
497 ms
menuseparator.png
497 ms
1-graph-slide-861e263fe8.jpg
580 ms
stoerer-kreis-2.png
579 ms
agil.png
498 ms
graph.png
497 ms
factory.png
499 ms
ga.js
472 ms
slideshow.js
223 ms
popup.html
260 ms
tooltip.html
260 ms
300lo.json
116 ms
close.png
219 ms
blank.gif
219 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
144 ms
collect
124 ms
collect
149 ms
__utm.gif
55 ms
2-networking-slide-8c8dd87d51.jpg
294 ms
3-n3-slide-a4995ce8ef.jpg
186 ms
4-futurenet-slide-e99a439477.jpg
297 ms
i-views.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
i-views.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
i-views.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise I-views.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that I-views.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
i-views.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of I Views. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: