617 ms in total
Welcome to icefox.net homepage info - get ready to check Icefox best content right away, or after learning these important things about icefox.netVisit icefox.net
We analyzed Icefox.net page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 525 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.
icefox.net performance score
Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Icefox.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (92 ms) belongs to the original domain Icefox.net.
Page size can be reduced by 111 B (41%)
In fact, the total size of Icefox.net main page is 272 B. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 272 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 111 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111 B or 41% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
icefox.net accessibility score
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
icefox.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
icefox.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Links are not crawlable
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Document uses legible font sizes
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Icefox.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Icefox.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Icefox. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: