Tools & Wizards About Us
ide64.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

ide64.org

The IDE64 Project

Page Load Speed

20.6 sec in total

First Response

6.1 sec

Resources Loaded

14.3 sec

Page Rendered

194 ms

ide64.org screenshot

About Website

Visit ide64.org now to see the best up-to-date IDE64 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ide64.org

IDE controller for the Commodore 64

Visit ide64.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Ide64.org page load time and found that the first response time was 6.1 sec and then it took 14.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ide64.org performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ide64.org

6062 ms

ide64.css

237 ms

navbarlogo

205 ms

ride_s41.gif

8363 ms

cargp.gif

7900 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Ide64.org, 13% (1 request) were made to Img.webring.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ide64.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.4 kB (62%)

Content Size

15.1 kB

After Optimization

5.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ide64.org main page is 15.1 kB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 12.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 12.1 kB
  • After minification 9.2 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.9 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 362 B

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, IDE64 needs image optimization as it can save up to 362 B or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 334 B

  • Original 568 B
  • After minification 388 B
  • After compression 234 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ide64.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 334 B or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IDE64. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

ide64.org

ide64.org

6062 ms

ide64.css

ide64.css

237 ms

navbarlogo

navbarlogo

205 ms

ride_s41.gif

ride_s41.gif

8363 ms

cargp.gif

cargp.gif

7900 ms

smc64sk.gif

smc64sk.gif

7731 ms

ide41casesmm.jpg

ide41casesmm.jpg

8259 ms

c64ii_fi.jpg

c64ii_fi.jpg

8146 ms

Accessibility Review

ide64.org accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ide64.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

ide64.org SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ide64.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ide64.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

ide64.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IDE64. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: