5.5 sec in total
228 ms
1.8 sec
3.5 sec
Visit ideseg.com now to see the best up-to-date Ideseg content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ideseg.com
Visit ideseg.comWe analyzed Ideseg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
ideseg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.9 s
100/100
10%
Value1.2 s
100/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
228 ms
299 ms
140 ms
165 ms
168 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ideseg.com, 17% (9 requests) were made to Blog.ideseg.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Lh5.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Blog.ideseg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 141.1 kB (25%)
556.8 kB
415.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ideseg.com main page is 556.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 354.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 143 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ideseg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 47% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ideseg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (45%)
44
24
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ideseg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ideseg.com
228 ms
blog.ideseg.com
299 ms
screen.css
140 ms
modernizr-2.0.js
165 ms
ender.js
168 ms
octopress.js
167 ms
css
36 ms
css
48 ms
jsapi
42 ms
twitter.js
106 ms
line-tile.png
240 ms
13 ms
default+en.css
5 ms
default+en.I.js
6 ms
ga.js
176 ms
IMG_0497.jpg
507 ms
IMG_0485.JPG
448 ms
IMG_0494.JPG
446 ms
wireless-speaker-adapter-glamour-images.png
473 ms
css004.jpg
628 ms
noise.png
1019 ms
IMG_0489.JPG
409 ms
ampli_iphone07.jpg
600 ms
css006.jpg
517 ms
emat1.gif
482 ms
emat2.gif
455 ms
css010.jpg
765 ms
css014.jpg
802 ms
emat3.gif
804 ms
gprofile_button-32.png
221 ms
IMG_0491.JPG
406 ms
css002.jpg
502 ms
css008.jpg
505 ms
ampli_iphone2.jpg
441 ms
ampli_iphone08.jpg
555 ms
css012.jpg
541 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
261 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
302 ms
EgBlzoNBIHxNPCMwXaAhYPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
229 ms
QABk9IxT-LFTJ_dQzv7xpJ0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
226 ms
03aPdn7fFF3H6ngCgAlQzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
228 ms
Foydq9xJp--nfYIx2TBz9fEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
228 ms
__utm.gif
105 ms
count.js
159 ms
widgets.js
215 ms
romheat.json
170 ms
__utm.gif
67 ms
rss.png
745 ms
count-data.js
179 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
128 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
53 ms
jot
83 ms
jot
23 ms
ideseg.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ideseg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
ideseg.com SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ideseg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ideseg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ideseg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ideseg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: