Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

5.5 sec

Page Rendered

635 ms

iebotox.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to iebotox.com homepage info - get ready to check Iebotox best content right away, or after learning these important things about iebotox.com

Enhance your beauty at West Point Aesthetic Centre in Encinitas, California—your top choice for aesthetic treatments. Schedule a visit today!

Visit iebotox.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Iebotox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

iebotox.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,490 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

iebotox.com

11 ms

iebotox.com

17 ms

www.iebotox.com

479 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

425 ms

script.js

550 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Iebotox.com, 67% (24 requests) were made to D3t5ai5vcxyqte.cloudfront.net and 3% (1 request) were made to Cdn-cookieyes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5 sec) relates to the external source D3t5ai5vcxyqte.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 522.7 kB (84%)

Content Size

621.4 kB

After Optimization

98.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Iebotox.com main page is 621.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 587.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 522.7 kB

  • Original 587.5 kB
  • After minification 587.5 kB
  • After compression 64.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 522.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 33.9 kB
  • After minification 33.9 kB
  • After compression 33.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (22%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Iebotox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

iebotox.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

iebotox.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

iebotox.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iebotox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Iebotox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Iebotox. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: