Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

ifbck.com

iFeedback® | Steigern Sie die Zufriedenheit Ihrer Kunden

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

338 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

141 ms

ifbck.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ifbck.com homepage info - get ready to check Ifbck best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about ifbck.com

iFeedback® | Sende Lob & Kritik direkt ans Management - In Echtzeit mit jedem Smartphone, in weniger als 30 Sekunden, an alle Unternehmen. Jetzt Feedback direkt ans Management abgeben.

Visit ifbck.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ifbck.com page load time and found that the first response time was 338 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ifbck.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ifbck.com

338 ms

ifbck.com

610 ms

b9db200ac9.css

116 ms

jquery.mobile-1.1.0.min.css

241 ms

test5.css

341 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ifbck.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (628 ms) belongs to the original domain Ifbck.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 12.0 kB (11%)

Content Size

112.7 kB

After Optimization

100.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Ifbck.com main page is 112.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 87.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 3.6 kB
  • After minification 2.9 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 661 B, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 87.2 kB
  • After minification 86.9 kB
  • After compression 81.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 22.0 kB
  • After minification 21.9 kB
  • After compression 18.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifbck.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (88%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ifbck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ifbck.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ifbck.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ifbck.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifbck.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Ifbck.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ifbck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: