Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

ifm.de

ifm electronic - Sensorik, Kommunikations- und Steuerungssysteme - ifm

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

300 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.9 sec

ifm.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ifm content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ifm.de

ifm entwickelt, produziert und vertreibt Sensoren, Steuerungen, Software und Systeme für die industrielle Automatisierung und Digitalisierung.

Visit ifm.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Ifm.de page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ifm.de performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value17,430 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.265

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ifm.de

300 ms

de

184 ms

de

441 ms

main.js

381 ms

optimize.js

155 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ifm.de, 84% (42 requests) were made to Ifm.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to App.usercentrics.eu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (441 ms) relates to the external source Ifm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 132.6 kB (77%)

Content Size

172.0 kB

After Optimization

39.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Ifm.de main page is 172.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 171.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 132.6 kB

  • Original 171.5 kB
  • After minification 156.1 kB
  • After compression 39.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 35 B

  • Original 522 B
  • After minification 487 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ifm images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (26%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ifm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ifm.de accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ifm.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ifm.de SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifm.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ifm.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ifm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: