7.4 sec in total
1.1 sec
6.2 sec
138 ms
Welcome to igf.net homepage info - get ready to check Igf best content right away, or after learning these important things about igf.net
Form piping systems designed to last long with our pipe fittings and tank fittings. Based in Harrison, AR, we primarily serve customers in the Dallas area.
Visit igf.netWe analyzed Igf.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
igf.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value1
2/100
15%
Value9.3 s
31/100
10%
1071 ms
1135 ms
1073 ms
1399 ms
133 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Igf.net, 49% (27 requests) were made to Assets.myregisteredsite.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Igf.net.
Page size can be reduced by 311.1 kB (40%)
771.1 kB
460.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Igf.net main page is 771.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 569.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 207.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Igf needs image optimization as it can save up to 207.8 kB or 36% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 31.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 29% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 643 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igf.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 643 B or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (73%)
44
12
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Igf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
igf.net
1071 ms
igf.net
1135 ms
www.igf.net
1073 ms
www.igf.net
1399 ms
jquery.js
133 ms
button.css
99 ms
browserBehavior.js
56 ms
utils.js
92 ms
shared.js
110 ms
navigation.js
134 ms
uaDefaultStylesReset.css
112 ms
popup.js
171 ms
ResourceLoader.js
115 ms
webcom_copyright_kw.js
113 ms
webfont.js
27 ms
googleFonts.css
23 ms
css
32 ms
css
46 ms
navigation.js
23 ms
core.js
21 ms
footercontact.js
24 ms
jqueryvalidate.js
22 ms
form.js
20 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
20 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
31 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
35 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
33 ms
hoverIntent.js
19 ms
bgIframe.js
18 ms
superfish.js
20 ms
handler.js
20 ms
helper.js
20 ms
positioner.js
26 ms
structure.css
37 ms
jquery.json-2.2.min.js
37 ms
templates.js
35 ms
footercontact.css
37 ms
utils.js
38 ms
resources.js
40 ms
templates.js
58 ms
form.css
55 ms
form_generic.css
53 ms
111433009.jpg
129 ms
111303436.png
73 ms
111303838.png
103 ms
111312920.png
143 ms
111312923.png
185 ms
111312926.png
231 ms
119640618.png
262 ms
119640616.png
698 ms
111304563.jpg
796 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf
31 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf
31 ms
logger.php
84 ms
frozen-redirect.html
1042 ms
igf.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
igf.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
igf.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igf.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Igf.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
igf.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Igf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: