2.6 sec in total
27 ms
1.9 sec
641 ms
Visit igt8.in now to see the best up-to-date IGT 8 content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about igt8.in
India's Got Talent 2022 Winner Name, IGT 9 Sony TV Top 7 Finalists Contestants List, Judges, Hosts, Timings, Online Voting, Winner, 1st, 2nd runner up
Visit igt8.inWe analyzed Igt8.in page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
igt8.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value760 ms
39/100
30%
Value0.17
70/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
27 ms
89 ms
297 ms
46 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Igt8.in, 10% (7 requests) were made to Blogger.googleusercontent.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (985 ms) relates to the external source Blogger.googleusercontent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 751.3 kB (38%)
2.0 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Igt8.in main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 126.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IGT 8 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 622.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 622.4 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igt8.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (52%)
52
25
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IGT 8. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
igt8.in
27 ms
www.igt8.in
89 ms
www.igt8.in
297 ms
55013136-widget_css_bundle.css
46 ms
css
58 ms
jquery.min.js
54 ms
related%20posts%20js.js
155 ms
adsbygoogle.js
85 ms
embed.js
117 ms
pagenavigation.txt.js
54 ms
js
102 ms
490852838-widgets.js
48 ms
summary
315 ms
igt8-logo.png
273 ms
indias%20got%20talent%20season%2010.JPG
516 ms
Anupriya-Goenka-Panchali.jpg
191 ms
fizah-khan.JPG
190 ms
bekaboo.PNG
191 ms
15-jury-saregamapa2018.JPG
264 ms
khatija%2Biqbal.JPG
400 ms
wanna%2Bhave%2Bgood%2Btime%2B2.JPG
400 ms
shark%20tank%20india%202.JPG
762 ms
masterchef%20india%202023.JPG
969 ms
tkss%20vicky%20kaushal%20kiara%20advani.JPG
812 ms
tkss%20riteish%20genelia.JPG
985 ms
kavya%20mihika.JPG
786 ms
durga%20aur%20charu%20episode%202.JPG
790 ms
super-singerjunior6-contestants.JPG
263 ms
authorization.css
71 ms
www.igt8.in
73 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJBkqs.woff
92 ms
show_ads_impl.js
207 ms
zrt_lookup.html
54 ms
RNzG0NGwa2w
11 ms
authorization.css
44 ms
FsFmo6zRnDE
10 ms
www.igt8.in
126 ms
v18hP6_eXUY
2 ms
L63agjBircQ
32 ms
7u3-Xvysw4c
32 ms
ZOlueLDvJxk
13 ms
logo-16.png
43 ms
back-top.png
103 ms
lower.png
162 ms
footer-line.png
102 ms
all.js
161 ms
script_v1.js
362 ms
addthis_widget.js
275 ms
js
59 ms
analytics.js
55 ms
ads
588 ms
ads
12 ms
all.js
11 ms
ads
106 ms
collect
48 ms
ads
286 ms
collect
21 ms
ga-audiences
28 ms
12129694915770235915
54 ms
abg_lite.js
41 ms
s
27 ms
window_focus.js
39 ms
qs_click_protection.js
46 ms
ufs_web_display.js
57 ms
one_click_handler_one_afma.js
50 ms
activeview
126 ms
reactive_library.js
104 ms
igt8.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
igt8.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
igt8.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igt8.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Igt8.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
igt8.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IGT 8. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: