Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

igt8.in

India's Got Talent 2022 Winner Name, IGT 9 TOP 7 Finalists Contestants, VOTE, Winner, Runners up

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

54 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

igt8.in screenshot

About Website

Visit igt8.in now to see the best up-to-date IGT 8 content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about igt8.in

India's Got Talent 2022 Winner Name, IGT 9 Sony TV Top 7 Finalists Contestants List, Judges, Hosts, Timings, Online Voting, Winner, 1st, 2nd runner up

Visit igt8.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Igt8.in page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

igt8.in performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value34,550 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.168

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value46.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

igt8.in

54 ms

www.igt8.in

73 ms

www.igt8.in

225 ms

55013136-widget_css_bundle.css

243 ms

css

269 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Igt8.in, 22% (16 requests) were made to Blogger.googleusercontent.com and 11% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Blogger.googleusercontent.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 419.1 kB (38%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

692.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Igt8.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 559.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 146.6 kB

  • Original 182.8 kB
  • After minification 180.6 kB
  • After compression 36.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 363.1 kB
  • After minification 354.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IGT 8 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 263.6 kB

  • Original 559.0 kB
  • After minification 559.0 kB
  • After compression 295.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 263.6 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 6.6 kB
  • After minification 6.6 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igt8.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (33%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IGT 8. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

igt8.in accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

igt8.in best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

igt8.in SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igt8.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Igt8.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IGT 8. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: