1.6 sec in total
63 ms
823 ms
682 ms
Click here to check amazing IL content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about il.net
Your hometown Internet Provider
Visit il.netWe analyzed Il.net page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
il.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
16/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value4.5 s
73/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
63 ms
179 ms
46 ms
39 ms
66 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Il.net, 36% (27 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (179 ms) belongs to the original domain Il.net.
Page size can be reduced by 591.0 kB (38%)
1.5 MB
958.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Il.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 784.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 461.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 461.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Il.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 29.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (23%)
65
50
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
il.net
63 ms
www.il.net
179 ms
style.min.css
46 ms
css
39 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
66 ms
modernizr.js
54 ms
main.js
38 ms
home.js
38 ms
js
90 ms
analytics.js
62 ms
il.net.png
62 ms
common.js
39 ms
map.js
56 ms
util.js
94 ms
marker.js
56 ms
primap.png
95 ms
overlay2.png
35 ms
accordion-shadow.png
35 ms
slide1.jpg
52 ms
crossroads_sign.png
54 ms
slide2.jpg
53 ms
money-jar.png
93 ms
slide3.jpg
92 ms
handshake.png
93 ms
slide4.jpg
94 ms
thumbs-up.png
95 ms
city-background.png
124 ms
fix-computer.png
140 ms
building-background.jpg
130 ms
cti-logo.png
123 ms
phone-button.png
122 ms
location-button.png
125 ms
email-button.png
141 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
16 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
16 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
17 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
17 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
17 ms
collect
19 ms
onion.js
20 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
56 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
41 ms
stats.js
32 ms
controls.js
50 ms
location-pointer.png
78 ms
transparent.png
35 ms
css
84 ms
vt
43 ms
vt
37 ms
vt
36 ms
vt
35 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
59 ms
vt
82 ms
vt
85 ms
vt
83 ms
vt
84 ms
vt
84 ms
vt
89 ms
vt
89 ms
vt
89 ms
google4.png
32 ms
mapcnt6.png
49 ms
sv5.png
54 ms
tmapctrl.png
43 ms
cb_scout5.png
45 ms
tmapctrl4.png
43 ms
google_white5.png
43 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
27 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
38 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
62 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
62 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
112 ms
il.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
il.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
il.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Il.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Il.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
il.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: