2.6 sec in total
304 ms
2.1 sec
151 ms
Click here to check amazing ILoad content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about iload.de
Full service usenet provider with an award winning software free to all users.All plans include longest retention and highest completion available, as well as SSL encryption.
Visit iload.deWe analyzed Iload.de page load time and found that the first response time was 304 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
iload.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value8.5 s
1/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value370 ms
70/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.3 s
40/100
10%
304 ms
578 ms
24 ms
39 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Iload.de, 67% (31 requests) were made to Iload-usenet.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (670 ms) relates to the external source Stats.iload-usenet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 94.3 kB (66%)
142.0 kB
47.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Iload.de main page is 142.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 119.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (58%)
36
15
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ILoad. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
iload.de
304 ms
home
578 ms
bundle.min.js
24 ms
css
39 ms
animate.min.css
119 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
207 ms
paymentfont.min.css
341 ms
theme.css
472 ms
frontend.css
341 ms
jquery.min.js
377 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
344 ms
popper.min.js
344 ms
bootstrap.min.js
460 ms
hs.core.js
376 ms
svg-injector.min.js
397 ms
hs.header.js
409 ms
hs.unfold.js
575 ms
hs.svg-injector.js
468 ms
jquery.cookie.js
576 ms
frontend.js
576 ms
gtm.js
70 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
collect
14 ms
collect
29 ms
js
46 ms
ga-audiences
129 ms
logo-white.svg
107 ms
logo.svg
105 ms
circle-preloader.svg
96 ms
wave-6-top-left.svg
95 ms
feature-1.svg
97 ms
feature-2.svg
100 ms
feature-3.svg
187 ms
curved-2.svg
184 ms
de16.png
188 ms
en16.png
186 ms
piwik.js
670 ms
fbds.js
49 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
34 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
38 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
48 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
52 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
331 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
327 ms
fa-light-300.woff
300 ms
paymentfont-webfont.woff
391 ms
iload.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
iload.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
iload.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iload.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Iload.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
iload.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ILoad. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: