6.8 sec in total
995 ms
5.4 sec
438 ms
Click here to check amazing Image Editing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about imageediting.com
ImageEditing is an offshore company providing professional Image Editing, Retouch, Vector and Digital Editing services 24X7. Start with a Free Trial Now!
Visit imageediting.comWe analyzed Imageediting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 995 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
imageediting.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value980 ms
28/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
995 ms
100 ms
49 ms
339 ms
343 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Imageediting.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Imageediting.com.
Page size can be reduced by 423.5 kB (34%)
1.3 MB
838.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Imageediting.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 652.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 188 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Image Editing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 324.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 324.9 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imageediting.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (63%)
71
26
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Image Editing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
imageediting.com
995 ms
gtm.js
100 ms
api.js
49 ms
style.min.css
339 ms
swipebox.min.css
343 ms
twenty20.css
354 ms
style.css
406 ms
dashicons.min.css
343 ms
bootstrap.min.css
36 ms
font-awesome.min.css
345 ms
noto-sans-plus-noto-serif-plus-inconsolata.css
634 ms
genericons.css
620 ms
style.css
585 ms
blocks.css
353 ms
jquery.min.js
373 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
655 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
649 ms
underscore.min.js
716 ms
infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js
900 ms
front.js
961 ms
bootstrap.min.js
940 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
881 ms
html5shiv-printshiv.min.js
966 ms
email-decode.min.js
718 ms
uploadcare.full.min.js
1292 ms
ie-uploadcare.js
1032 ms
trial-styles.css
1123 ms
css
38 ms
rs6.css
912 ms
rbtools.min.js
1411 ms
rs6.min.js
1218 ms
jquery.twenty20.js
1207 ms
jquery.event.move.js
1220 ms
l.js
50 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
1957 ms
functions.js
1386 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1472 ms
maxmegamenu.js
2174 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
29 ms
js
77 ms
ga-audiences
27 ms
image-editing-logo.png
504 ms
image-editing-logo-sm.png
666 ms
imageediting-banner.jpg
1397 ms
background-remove.png
738 ms
neck-add-service-by-imageediting.png
862 ms
Web-resize-by-imageediting.png
1665 ms
shadow-By-ImageEditing.png
995 ms
Hair-Masking-ImageEditing.png
1200 ms
portrait-retouching-by-imageediting.png
1279 ms
dummy.png
1338 ms
Rebecca.png
1457 ms
natalia.png
1457 ms
aussie-logo.png
1537 ms
Rogers.png
1547 ms
Deanbradelylogo-ie.png
1639 ms
allerlei4kids-logo.png
1778 ms
iso-certified-image-editing-blue-sm.png
1709 ms
ie-achievements-bg.jpg
1744 ms
wARDj0u
17 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1821 ms
tracking.js
31 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
18 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
25 ms
client.js
21 ms
client_default.css
67 ms
insight.min.js
76 ms
recaptcha__en.js
81 ms
fallback
27 ms
fallback__ltr.css
4 ms
css
14 ms
logo_48.png
5 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
4 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
8 ms
palanquin-bold-webfont.woff
258 ms
palanquin-light-webfont.woff
269 ms
palanquin-regular-webfont.woff
309 ms
flexslider.css
305 ms
feature-icons.png
322 ms
imageediting.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
imageediting.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
imageediting.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imageediting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imageediting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imageediting.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Image Editing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: