Tools & Wizards About Us
imagestream.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

imagestream.com

ImageStream - Tecnología de vanguardia y alto rendimiento

Page Load Speed

21 sec in total

First Response

176 ms

Resources Loaded

20.3 sec

Page Rendered

556 ms

imagestream.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to imagestream.com homepage info - get ready to check Image Stream best content for Mexico right away, or after learning these important things about imagestream.com

ImageStream es un líder innovador en tecnología de telecomunicaciones desde 1995. Especializados en routers basados en Linux, tecnologías 3G/4G y soluciones avanzadas en la nube, proporcionamos equipo...

Visit imagestream.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Imagestream.com page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 20.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

imagestream.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imagestream.com

176 ms

imagestream.com

393 ms

css2

39 ms

bootstrap.min.css

27 ms

all.min.css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Imagestream.com, 15% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Imagestream.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 642.4 kB (19%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Imagestream.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 28.3 kB

  • Original 33.4 kB
  • After minification 20.9 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.5 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 109.3 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Image Stream images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 443.9 kB

  • Original 590.0 kB
  • After minification 588.4 kB
  • After compression 146.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 443.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 60.8 kB

  • Original 71.9 kB
  • After minification 56.2 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imagestream.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (43%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Image Stream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

imagestream.com

imagestream.com

176 ms

imagestream.com

imagestream.com

393 ms

css2

css2

39 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

27 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

33 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

148 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

224 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

224 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

228 ms

slick.css

slick.css

225 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

227 ms

style.css

style.css

378 ms

logo_ImageStream.png

logo_ImageStream.png

298 ms

usa.png

usa.png

226 ms

mexico.png

mexico.png

228 ms

carousel-1.png

carousel-1.png

5700 ms

carousel-3.jpg

carousel-3.jpg

1229 ms

carousel-2.jpg

carousel-2.jpg

575 ms

carousel-4.jpg

carousel-4.jpg

1100 ms

carousel-5.jpg

carousel-5.jpg

880 ms

carousel-6.jpg

carousel-6.jpg

2732 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

16 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

12 ms

easing.min.js

easing.min.js

651 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

860 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1720 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

1105 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

1172 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1180 ms

counterup.min.js

counterup.min.js

1247 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1331 ms

vue.js

vue.js

2607 ms

main.js

main.js

1322 ms

about.png

about.png

19745 ms

service-1.jpg

service-1.jpg

1553 ms

service-2.jpg

service-2.jpg

1850 ms

service-3.jpg

service-3.jpg

2357 ms

inami.png

inami.png

1998 ms

sat.png

sat.png

2073 ms

sesa.png

sesa.png

2148 ms

tulum.png

tulum.png

2223 ms

benitojuarez.png

benitojuarez.png

2298 ms

playadelcarmen.png

playadelcarmen.png

2445 ms

quintanaroo.png

quintanaroo.png

2363 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJM.woff

41 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1g.woff

40 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1g.woff

57 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1g.woff

59 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedA.woff

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedA.woff

58 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1g.woff

57 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1g.woff

58 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1g.woff

57 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1g.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1g.woff

57 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

2173 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

2113 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

22 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

19 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

36 ms

prev.png

prev.png

75 ms

next.png

next.png

75 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

76 ms

close.png

close.png

149 ms

Accessibility Review

imagestream.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

imagestream.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

imagestream.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imagestream.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imagestream.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

imagestream.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Image Stream. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: