Tools & Wizards About Us
imarkmosaic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

imarkmosaic.com

China Mosaic Tile Factory,Glass Mosaic,Ceramic Mosaic,Pearl Tile,Backsplash Tile

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

588 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

337 ms

imarkmosaic.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Imark Mosaic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about imarkmosaic.com

IMARK China mosaic tile manufacturer supplier, ceramic mosaic tile, glass mosaic tile, marble mosaic tile, metal mosaic tile, shell tile, pool tile, pearl tile.

Visit imarkmosaic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Imarkmosaic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 588 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imarkmosaic.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.135

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imarkmosaic.com

588 ms

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

699 ms

theme-bundle.head_async.js

190 ms

webfont.js

58 ms

css

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Imarkmosaic.com, 51% (20 requests) were made to Cdn11.bigcommerce.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (699 ms) relates to the external source Cdn11.bigcommerce.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 125.9 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Imarkmosaic.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 125.2 kB

  • Original 148.0 kB
  • After minification 133.8 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imark Mosaic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 628 B

  • Original 261.0 kB
  • After minification 261.0 kB
  • After compression 260.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (40%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imark Mosaic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

imarkmosaic.com

imarkmosaic.com

588 ms

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

699 ms

theme-bundle.head_async.js

theme-bundle.head_async.js

190 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

58 ms

css

css

81 ms

theme-df0042c0-003a-013b-6e02-4e131278934b.css

theme-df0042c0-003a-013b-6e02-4e131278934b.css

84 ms

js

js

229 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

79 ms

theme-bundle.main.js

theme-bundle.main.js

188 ms

theme-bundle.chunk.vendors.js

theme-bundle.chunk.vendors.js

187 ms

csrf-protection-header-5eeddd5de78d98d146ef4fd71b2aedce4161903e.js

csrf-protection-header-5eeddd5de78d98d146ef4fd71b2aedce4161903e.js

223 ms

visitor_stencil.js

visitor_stencil.js

224 ms

pew8wuxxp3wm7eobdtkmvvlysxqnwyov.js

pew8wuxxp3wm7eobdtkmvvlysxqnwyov.js

306 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

136 ms

-2_1516027643__38271.original.jpg

-2_1516027643__38271.original.jpg

94 ms

imark-mosaic.jpg

imark-mosaic.jpg

307 ms

poster.jpg

poster.jpg

286 ms

0__52980.1700881283.jpg

0__52980.1700881283.jpg

259 ms

4__34208.1700881303.jpg

4__34208.1700881303.jpg

240 ms

97M67-_IMARK__06582.1653043458.jpg

97M67-_IMARK__06582.1653043458.jpg

258 ms

97M67_-3__52036.1653043466.jpg

97M67_-3__52036.1653043466.jpg

456 ms

MC9710__20929.1653042568.jpg

MC9710__20929.1653042568.jpg

526 ms

MC9710_6__32620.1653042477.jpg

MC9710_6__32620.1653042477.jpg

456 ms

97M65_IMARK__65512.1653040581.jpg

97M65_IMARK__65512.1653040581.jpg

525 ms

97M65_-1__09065.1653040589.jpg

97M65_-1__09065.1653040589.jpg

526 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

90 ms

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lM.woff

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lM.woff

126 ms

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lM.woff

qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lM.woff

168 ms

emthemesmodezicons.ttf

emthemesmodezicons.ttf

607 ms

qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNmlUHlIb7U.woff

qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNmlUHlIb7U.woff

79 ms

qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNlCV3lIb7U.woff

qkBKXvYC6trAT7RQNNK2EG7SIwPWMNlCV3lIb7U.woff

79 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

621 ms

pew8wuxxp3wm7eobdtkmvvlysxqnwyov.js

pew8wuxxp3wm7eobdtkmvvlysxqnwyov.js

163 ms

nobot

nobot

40 ms

bigcommerce-launcher.js

bigcommerce-launcher.js

100 ms

index.php

index.php

89 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

83 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

65 ms

ads

ads

42 ms

Accessibility Review

imarkmosaic.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

imarkmosaic.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

imarkmosaic.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imarkmosaic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imarkmosaic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

imarkmosaic.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imark Mosaic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: