2 sec in total
32 ms
958 ms
965 ms
Visit imgix.com now to see the best up-to-date Imgix content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about imgix.com
imgix transforms, optimizes, and intelligently caches your entire asset library for faster pages, higher engagement, and a simpler workflow.
Visit imgix.comWe analyzed Imgix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
imgix.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value1,110 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.342
33/100
15%
Value10.3 s
24/100
10%
32 ms
26 ms
102 ms
78 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Imgix.com, 24% (15 requests) were made to Assets.imgix.net and 10% (6 requests) were made to Static-c.imgix.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (452 ms) relates to the external source Assets.imgix.net.
Page size can be reduced by 518.5 kB (41%)
1.3 MB
751.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Imgix.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 560.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imgix images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 221.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.9 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 213.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imgix.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 213.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (45%)
58
32
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imgix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.imgix.com
32 ms
jquery.min.js
26 ms
ix.css
102 ms
prettify.js
78 ms
bootstrap.js
132 ms
Luminous.min.js
84 ms
62503.js
217 ms
imgix.js
68 ms
imgix-homepage.js
98 ms
conversion.js
37 ms
st.js
31 ms
analytics.min.js
372 ms
rasterize-531237429debd3230d66f08dfe0054caaa005f73.js
93 ms
widget.js
105 ms
swiftype-179f8909e063840665bced090aa7b3b1.css
8 ms
swiftype_onpage-02d2e72de5fcf9d8823ddf010d36df29.js
22 ms
feature-face-detection.png
448 ms
auto-format.png
452 ms
feature-fastimages.png
421 ms
fbds.js
270 ms
cc.js
123 ms
visor-ui-blank.png
288 ms
puffins.jpg
235 ms
auto-format.png
290 ms
feature-graphics-04.pdf
317 ms
feature-graphics-04.pdf
305 ms
feature-graphics-04.pdf
322 ms
feature-graphics-04.pdf
295 ms
feature-graphics-04.pdf
309 ms
feature-graphics-04.pdf
302 ms
feature-graphics-04.pdf
306 ms
feature-graphics-04.pdf
408 ms
feature-graphics-04.pdf
315 ms
feature-graphics-04.pdf
358 ms
feature-gears.png
307 ms
feature-fastimages.png
276 ms
feature-gears.png
286 ms
feature-retina.png
275 ms
feature-odometer.png
254 ms
feature-face-detection.png
274 ms
feature-retina.png
358 ms
feature-odometer.png
280 ms
adellesans-regular.woff
151 ms
adellesans-bold.woff
199 ms
adelle-bold.woff
199 ms
fbevents.js
125 ms
analytics.js
158 ms
mixpanel-2-latest.min.js
49 ms
3496.js
76 ms
chartbeat.js
177 ms
cc
170 ms
173 ms
137 ms
135 ms
82 ms
collect
32 ms
collect
63 ms
collect
34 ms
adsct
94 ms
ping
22 ms
puffins.jpg
13 ms
551c3219fbca2ac418000651.js
6 ms
pd.js
5 ms
imgix.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
imgix.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
imgix.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imgix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imgix.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imgix.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imgix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: