Tools & Wizards About Us
imind.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

imind.com

Secure Video conferencing Online From Any Device • iMind

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

207 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

122 ms

imind.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing IMind content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about imind.com

Secure HD quality videocall. Host 4-hour-long meetings for free. See who is entering the conference. Share multiple screens simultaneously. Record meetings.

Visit imind.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Imind.com page load time and found that the first response time was 207 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imind.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,450 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.111

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imind.com

207 ms

imind.com

597 ms

nprogress.css

275 ms

1007148.js

362 ms

js

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Imind.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Tracking.g2crowd.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Imind.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (41%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Imind.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 161.6 kB

  • Original 231.1 kB
  • After minification 231.1 kB
  • After compression 69.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 161.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 655.9 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, IMind needs image optimization as it can save up to 655.9 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 765.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 352.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 765.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 69.0 kB

  • Original 92.3 kB
  • After minification 92.3 kB
  • After compression 23.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imind.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (66%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IMind. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

imind.com

imind.com

207 ms

imind.com

imind.com

597 ms

nprogress.css

nprogress.css

275 ms

1007148.js

1007148.js

362 ms

js

js

76 ms

826e542deef4eb9a.css

826e542deef4eb9a.css

274 ms

df733ea710e97dab.css

df733ea710e97dab.css

392 ms

cdbab493b7a269f8.css

cdbab493b7a269f8.css

393 ms

81817a50d2ff5108.css

81817a50d2ff5108.css

275 ms

d07254816624c49b.css

d07254816624c49b.css

391 ms

2c7d7b66dabbb1aa.css

2c7d7b66dabbb1aa.css

457 ms

98f822013a87f5ab.css

98f822013a87f5ab.css

393 ms

c3b1a444298e63a5.css

c3b1a444298e63a5.css

452 ms

f76024eae1f5e076.css

f76024eae1f5e076.css

453 ms

2f1112ac94166a03.css

2f1112ac94166a03.css

454 ms

df304d7653f94119.css

df304d7653f94119.css

455 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

640 ms

4152.c13b63f7f0c0e0a2.js

4152.c13b63f7f0c0e0a2.js

633 ms

939-c618321b7a739e0a.js

939-c618321b7a739e0a.js

543 ms

5237-e142418109afbd47.js

5237-e142418109afbd47.js

544 ms

1968-ab3d63c55c13b054.js

1968-ab3d63c55c13b054.js

635 ms

7007-2b6c66d5e97eef3f.js

7007-2b6c66d5e97eef3f.js

636 ms

7949.1d18487e8caf8ac6.js

7949.1d18487e8caf8ac6.js

723 ms

2114.423f26caee5b5357.js

2114.423f26caee5b5357.js

634 ms

2535.0e9fffb42af347b4.js

2535.0e9fffb42af347b4.js

724 ms

4576.d0d426ee72ff5550.js

4576.d0d426ee72ff5550.js

725 ms

4722-d68a4939349426ba.js

4722-d68a4939349426ba.js

906 ms

1914.64dd02f2ddb6cccb.js

1914.64dd02f2ddb6cccb.js

725 ms

3070.d5bd7bd959daa57b.js

3070.d5bd7bd959daa57b.js

729 ms

3320.173c8d6d2f3b4b17.js

3320.173c8d6d2f3b4b17.js

813 ms

9819.50325c7cd0eb92d2.js

9819.50325c7cd0eb92d2.js

813 ms

webpack-a4e977b837c5bc24.js

webpack-a4e977b837c5bc24.js

814 ms

framework-ce84985cd166733a.js

framework-ce84985cd166733a.js

909 ms

main-895c525af3fddc3a.js

main-895c525af3fddc3a.js

914 ms

_app-44ac2c6e3c9f2a43.js

_app-44ac2c6e3c9f2a43.js

1084 ms

7361-c91ceb1033d4e1f2.js

7361-c91ceb1033d4e1f2.js

903 ms

1966-055e39bf38adef4c.js

1966-055e39bf38adef4c.js

908 ms

2492-c34aaa5e12637672.js

2492-c34aaa5e12637672.js

995 ms

3253-c65ad46fc0941672.js

3253-c65ad46fc0941672.js

996 ms

2276-99f8fcacca2e2170.js

2276-99f8fcacca2e2170.js

823 ms

index-e143b9bf01e7a840.js

index-e143b9bf01e7a840.js

730 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

734 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

821 ms

logo-white-without-bg.png

logo-white-without-bg.png

705 ms

mobile-menu-logo.png

mobile-menu-logo.png

704 ms

us.png

us.png

703 ms

ru.png

ru.png

706 ms

main-page-logo.png

main-page-logo.png

727 ms

Scene_8_preview.png

Scene_8_preview.png

2542 ms

2.jpeg

2.jpeg

729 ms

Scene_3_preview@blur.png

Scene_3_preview@blur.png

731 ms

3.jpeg

3.jpeg

706 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

20 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

29 ms

Scene_2_preview@blur.png

Scene_2_preview@blur.png

831 ms

4.jpeg

4.jpeg

727 ms

Scene_11_preview@blur.png

Scene_11_preview@blur.png

915 ms

5.jpeg

5.jpeg

643 ms

Scene_6_preview@blur.png

Scene_6_preview@blur.png

913 ms

6.jpeg

6.jpeg

727 ms

Scene_5_preview@blur.png

Scene_5_preview@blur.png

799 ms

7.jpeg

7.jpeg

730 ms

Scene_9_preview@blur.png

Scene_9_preview@blur.png

924 ms

Accessibility Review

imind.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

imind.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

imind.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imind.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imind.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

imind.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IMind. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: