Tools & Wizards About Us
immedicare.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

immedicare.co.uk

Home - Immedicare

Page Load Speed

10.6 sec in total

First Response

3.4 sec

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

423 ms

immedicare.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit immedicare.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Immedicare content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about immedicare.co.uk

Working to improve the lives of those living and working in care homes Immedicare meets everyday health and care needs, with our team of specialists providing digital care services 24 hours of the day...

Visit immedicare.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Immedicare.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 3.4 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

immedicare.co.uk performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,200 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value32.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

immedicare.co.uk

3387 ms

js

87 ms

custom-frontend-lite.min.css

304 ms

post-2256.css

309 ms

theme.min.css

307 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Immedicare.co.uk, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Immedicare.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (71%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Immedicare.co.uk main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 193.5 kB

  • Original 230.0 kB
  • After minification 212.9 kB
  • After compression 36.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 193.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 521.9 kB
  • After minification 514.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Immedicare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 855.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 388.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 855.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.9 MB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB
  • After compression 256.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Immedicare.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (89%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Immedicare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

immedicare.co.uk

immedicare.co.uk

3387 ms

js

js

87 ms

custom-frontend-lite.min.css

custom-frontend-lite.min.css

304 ms

post-2256.css

post-2256.css

309 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

307 ms

style.css

style.css

231 ms

bdt-uikit.css

bdt-uikit.css

390 ms

ep-helper.css

ep-helper.css

312 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

539 ms

readabler.min.css

readabler.min.css

458 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

383 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

384 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

467 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

462 ms

public.css

public.css

541 ms

jet-elements.css

jet-elements.css

697 ms

jet-elements-skin.css

jet-elements-skin.css

535 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

543 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

544 ms

custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css

custom-pro-frontend-lite.min.css

612 ms

main.css

main.css

616 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

618 ms

post-10.css

post-10.css

617 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

707 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

847 ms

widget-styles-pro.css

widget-styles-pro.css

866 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

693 ms

css

css

35 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

703 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

771 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

772 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

774 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

783 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

865 ms

42.css

42.css

835 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

863 ms

widget-share-buttons.min.css

widget-share-buttons.min.css

863 ms

custom-widget-icon-list.min.css

custom-widget-icon-list.min.css

901 ms

micromodal.min.js

micromodal.min.js

928 ms

hotkeys.min.js

hotkeys.min.js

774 ms

simple-keyboard.min.js

simple-keyboard.min.js

701 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

699 ms

readabler.min.js

readabler.min.js

699 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

750 ms

vue.min.js

vue.min.js

714 ms

jet-menu-public-scripts.js

jet-menu-public-scripts.js

678 ms

ooohboi-steroids.js

ooohboi-steroids.js

671 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

605 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

602 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

627 ms

dwf.js

dwf.js

570 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

564 ms

jquery-numerator.min.js

jquery-numerator.min.js

560 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

603 ms

bdt-uikit.min.js

bdt-uikit.min.js

621 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

556 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

558 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

551 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

552 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

527 ms

helper.min.js

helper.min.js

539 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

536 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

535 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

476 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

478 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

525 ms

jet-elements.min.js

jet-elements.min.js

537 ms

widgets-scripts.js

widgets-scripts.js

458 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

424 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

397 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

400 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

446 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

436 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

402 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

403 ms

Banner-heart-left.svg

Banner-heart-left.svg

457 ms

Telehub1.1-1-scaled.jpg

Telehub1.1-1-scaled.jpg

577 ms

Banner-heart-right.svg

Banner-heart-right.svg

459 ms

Frutiger-Roman-1.ttf

Frutiger-Roman-1.ttf

477 ms

font

font

64 ms

Frutiger_bold-1.ttf

Frutiger_bold-1.ttf

448 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

449 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

448 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

489 ms

elementskit.woff

elementskit.woff

737 ms

VAG-Rounded-Bold-1-1.ttf

VAG-Rounded-Bold-1-1.ttf

477 ms

VAGRoundedStd-Light-1.ttf

VAGRoundedStd-Light-1.ttf

476 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

476 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

517 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

502 ms

Immedicare-logo-transparent-background-small-for-web-1.png

Immedicare-logo-transparent-background-small-for-web-1.png

501 ms

a-NHS-Service-for-Website-1.png

a-NHS-Service-for-Website-1.png

483 ms

en.svg

en.svg

233 ms

Accessibility Review

immedicare.co.uk accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

immedicare.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

immedicare.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Immedicare.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Immedicare.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

immedicare.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Immedicare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: