5 sec in total
269 ms
4.4 sec
321 ms
Visit imprintshoes.com now to see the best up-to-date Imprint Shoes content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about imprintshoes.com
Imprint Homepage detailing conditions which can be treated by Imprint products and describing features of the Imprint Systems and horseshoes.
Visit imprintshoes.comWe analyzed Imprintshoes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 269 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
imprintshoes.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value17.5 s
0/100
25%
Value14.1 s
1/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.046
99/100
15%
Value17.9 s
3/100
10%
269 ms
1319 ms
157 ms
255 ms
274 ms
Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Imprintshoes.com, 71% (90 requests) were made to Imprintshoes.co.uk and 15% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Imprintshoes.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 695.6 kB (28%)
2.5 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Imprintshoes.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 122.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imprint Shoes images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 549.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 549.9 kB or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imprintshoes.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (83%)
104
18
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imprint Shoes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 61 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
imprintshoes.com
269 ms
www.imprintshoes.co.uk
1319 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
157 ms
style.min.css
255 ms
classic-themes.min.css
274 ms
styles.css
278 ms
wp-date-remover-public.css
279 ms
style.css
278 ms
plugins.min.css
283 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
346 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
364 ms
modules.min.css
469 ms
font-awesome.min.css
371 ms
style.min.css
370 ms
ionicons.min.css
381 ms
style.css
440 ms
simple-line-icons.css
454 ms
dripicons.css
465 ms
blog.min.css
464 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
485 ms
blog-responsive.min.css
534 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
545 ms
restaurant.min.css
557 ms
style_dynamic.css
559 ms
js_composer.min.css
571 ms
css
26 ms
front.min.css
588 ms
jquery.min.js
723 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
636 ms
rbtools.min.js
789 ms
rs6.min.js
996 ms
wp-date-remover-public.js
664 ms
front.min.js
667 ms
css
12 ms
rs6.css
736 ms
index.js
736 ms
index.js
737 ms
core.min.js
780 ms
tabs.min.js
781 ms
api.js
42 ms
accordion.min.js
799 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
739 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
640 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
730 ms
jquery.appear.js
724 ms
modernizr.custom.85257.js
724 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
725 ms
jquery.plugin.js
720 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
735 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
715 ms
parallax.min.js
706 ms
select2.min.js
706 ms
easypiechart.js
700 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
645 ms
Chart.min.js
816 ms
counter.js
804 ms
fluidvids.min.js
809 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
786 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
788 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
742 ms
TweenLite.min.js
871 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
855 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
854 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
825 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
816 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
775 ms
skrollr.js
764 ms
bootstrapCarousel.js
765 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
652 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
646 ms
modules.js
649 ms
blog.min.js
648 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
55 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
68 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
93 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
92 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
94 ms
comment-reply.min.js
724 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
691 ms
like.min.js
671 ms
datepicker.min.js
667 ms
page.php
197 ms
restaurant.min.js
656 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
635 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAUi-v.ttf
25 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_FQfo.ttf
24 ms
S6u-w4BMUTPHjxsIPx-mPCc.ttf
26 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_FQfo.ttf
96 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI3wi_FQfo.ttf
99 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUhiYA.ttf
100 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUhiYA.ttf
105 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUhiYA.ttf
108 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvsUhiYA.ttf
108 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUhiYA.ttf
106 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUhiYA.ttf
107 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
629 ms
index.js
635 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
714 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
741 ms
Logo-Retina.jpg
650 ms
dummy.png
650 ms
Signature200x140-120x91.jpg
636 ms
laminitic-foot-2x600-150x150.jpg
662 ms
poor-hoof-wall-2x600-150x150.jpg
662 ms
foal-deformity-2x600-150x150.jpg
663 ms
yZg_AM4GYRl.css
198 ms
nDOmhvCeUjd.js
207 ms
8ZrPme2EwKH.js
206 ms
ru8zNtgW1u3.js
236 ms
91fY1Wa8SUF.js
242 ms
p55HfXW__mM.js
242 ms
oGNFfuRupM0.js
242 ms
abscess-2x600-150x150.jpg
725 ms
Andrew-Poynton-FWCF-588x588-1.jpg
828 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
68 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
75 ms
Training-event.jpg
819 ms
hoof-sole-prolapsed-lamellae-draining-500x500-1.jpg
636 ms
Image2-500x500-1.jpg
633 ms
1B-20220413_a112955-500x500-1.jpg
821 ms
308003338_517783940158967_737173196482397618_n.jpg
97 ms
307464118_517783336825694_2805954631769391213_n.jpg
84 ms
UXtr_j2Fwe-.png
71 ms
fxhiXGlsosz.js
38 ms
kCgk__hWT3L.js
36 ms
recaptcha__en.js
24 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
4 ms
imprintshoes.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
imprintshoes.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
imprintshoes.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imprintshoes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imprintshoes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imprintshoes.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imprint Shoes. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: