Tools & Wizards About Us
in.sharp screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

in.sharp

Sharp India- Smart Business & Appliances Solutions

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

629 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

62 ms

in.sharp screenshot

About Website

Visit in.sharp now to see the best up-to-date In content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about in.sharp

Sharp India known globally for its unique technology Business Products and Home Appliances. We provide best market-leading products (Air Purifiers, MFP Printers, Water Purifiers & Refrigerators).

Visit in.sharp

Key Findings

We analyzed In.sharp page load time and found that the first response time was 629 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

in.sharp performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

in.sharp

629 ms

in.sharp

1226 ms

gtm.js

77 ms

1600x900px.webp

445 ms

home-banners-4.webp

1102 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original In.sharp, 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain In.sharp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.6 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of In.sharp main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 142.7 kB

  • Original 173.0 kB
  • After minification 155.7 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 43.0 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. In images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

46

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of In. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

in.sharp

in.sharp

629 ms

in.sharp

in.sharp

1226 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

77 ms

1600x900px.webp

1600x900px.webp

445 ms

home-banners-4.webp

home-banners-4.webp

1102 ms

news-bg.webp

news-bg.webp

671 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

665 ms

centuryregular.woff

centuryregular.woff

894 ms

centurybold.woff

centurybold.woff

1136 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

33 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1294 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

34 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

46 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1277 ms

logo.png

logo.png

222 ms

9-1-scaled.webp

9-1-scaled.webp

1080 ms

1-scaled.jpg

1-scaled.jpg

1333 ms

1-1-scaled.jpg

1-1-scaled.jpg

1516 ms

Robert-San.webp

Robert-San.webp

935 ms

Layer-4-1.png

Layer-4-1.png

1099 ms

Image-resize-1.jpg

Image-resize-1.jpg

1128 ms

Layer-7.png

Layer-7.png

1626 ms

Resize-image-1.jpg

Resize-image-1.jpg

1309 ms

solapur.png

solapur.png

1772 ms

Re-size-2.webp

Re-size-2.webp

1356 ms

Re-size-2.webp

Re-size-2.webp

1531 ms

image2.webp

image2.webp

1565 ms

image1.webp

image1.webp

1589 ms

image2.webp

image2.webp

1743 ms

image1.webp

image1.webp

1768 ms

image3.webp

image3.webp

1797 ms

image3.webp

image3.webp

1820 ms

image3.webp

image3.webp

1864 ms

image3.webp

image3.webp

1975 ms

Windows-Collaboration-Display-System-news.png

Windows-Collaboration-Display-System-news.png

1992 ms

news1.jpg

news1.jpg

2000 ms

news1.webp

news1.webp

2022 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

2052 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

2098 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

2199 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

2212 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

2223 ms

4-1-1.jpg

4-1-1.jpg

2249 ms

4-1-1.jpg

4-1-1.jpg

2286 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

2334 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

2209 ms

7-1.jpg

7-1.jpg

2205 ms

7-1.jpg

7-1.jpg

2028 ms

6-1.jpg

6-1.jpg

2006 ms

IMG_0562-scaled-1.jpg

IMG_0562-scaled-1.jpg

2088 ms

IMG_0562-scaled.jpg

IMG_0562-scaled.jpg

1908 ms

6-1.jpg

6-1.jpg

1726 ms

8-1.jpg

8-1.jpg

1580 ms

8-1.jpg

8-1.jpg

1578 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

1582 ms

Accessibility Review

in.sharp accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

in.sharp best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

in.sharp SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise In.sharp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that In.sharp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

in.sharp

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of In. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: