Tools & Wizards About Us
inapl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

inapl.com

Information Alignment Home | Mine Data Software | Mining Production Data

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

24 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

731 ms

inapl.com screenshot

About Website

Visit inapl.com now to see the best up-to-date Inapl content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inapl.com

Transform your mining production data with Connected Mine. Get accurate, reliable production reporting and end-to-end insights.

Visit inapl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inapl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 24 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inapl.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.9 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,080 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inapl.com

24 ms

autoptimize_1ba11fee199b6aedb4a44b2165e6a01a.css

1259 ms

autoptimize_04f0e79b77189eaf76a619ced89eb990.css

1015 ms

autoptimize_single_ab72474ff9f24f26d2251aa70f466768.css

966 ms

autoptimize_single_59b7d3f845b2d19ad8457de2a0e47053.css

763 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Inapl.com, 14% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Inapl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 508.3 kB (17%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Inapl.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 72.2 kB

  • Original 87.9 kB
  • After minification 86.0 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 435.9 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Inapl needs image optimization as it can save up to 435.9 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 251 B

  • Original 689 B
  • After minification 689 B
  • After compression 438 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 251 B or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (56%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inapl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inapl.com

inapl.com

24 ms

autoptimize_1ba11fee199b6aedb4a44b2165e6a01a.css

autoptimize_1ba11fee199b6aedb4a44b2165e6a01a.css

1259 ms

autoptimize_04f0e79b77189eaf76a619ced89eb990.css

autoptimize_04f0e79b77189eaf76a619ced89eb990.css

1015 ms

autoptimize_single_ab72474ff9f24f26d2251aa70f466768.css

autoptimize_single_ab72474ff9f24f26d2251aa70f466768.css

966 ms

autoptimize_single_59b7d3f845b2d19ad8457de2a0e47053.css

autoptimize_single_59b7d3f845b2d19ad8457de2a0e47053.css

763 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1060 ms

js

js

86 ms

autoptimize_8aa4ba9d9587a8fd4a68d2c411c6a15f.js

autoptimize_8aa4ba9d9587a8fd4a68d2c411c6a15f.js

1413 ms

css

css

32 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

97 ms

ik4penbwye

ik4penbwye

115 ms

BackDrop2.png

BackDrop2.png

1162 ms

Home-Screen-1536x864.png

Home-Screen-1536x864.png

1535 ms

spatial-2-backdrop-hires-Large.png

spatial-2-backdrop-hires-Large.png

1978 ms

backDrop3.png

backDrop3.png

1907 ms

poppins-bold.ttf

poppins-bold.ttf

1096 ms

poppins-extrabold.ttf

poppins-extrabold.ttf

1102 ms

poppins-black.ttf

poppins-black.ttf

1560 ms

poppins-semibold.ttf

poppins-semibold.ttf

2185 ms

poppins-medium.ttf

poppins-medium.ttf

2221 ms

poppins-regular.ttf

poppins-regular.ttf

2545 ms

poppins-light.ttf

poppins-light.ttf

2705 ms

poppins-extralight.ttf

poppins-extralight.ttf

2920 ms

poppins-thin.ttf

poppins-thin.ttf

2964 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

25 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

32 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

54 ms

inapl.woff

inapl.woff

3097 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

62 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

61 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

3328 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

90 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

12 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

47 ms

c.gif

c.gif

8 ms

Accessibility Review

inapl.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

inapl.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

inapl.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inapl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inapl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inapl.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Inapl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: