Tools & Wizards About Us
inaya.ae screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

inaya.ae

Leading Facility Management Company in Dubai | FM Companies In Dubai | Abu Dhabi, UAE | INAYA Facilities Management | Facility Management Dubai

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

352 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

220 ms

inaya.ae screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing INAYA content for United Arab Emirates. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about inaya.ae

INAYA is a leading Facilities Management company in UAE. INAYA develops, manages and executes FM strategies to maximise the performance and lifecycle of client assets. INAYA offers maintenance, cleani...

Visit inaya.ae

Key Findings

We analyzed Inaya.ae page load time and found that the first response time was 352 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inaya.ae performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,270 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.876

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.9 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inaya.ae

352 ms

www.inaya.ae.

541 ms

bootstrap.min.css

320 ms

style.css

132 ms

style-responsive.css

131 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Inaya.ae, 5% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com and 2% (1 request) were made to 0. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (541 ms) relates to the external source .

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 420.9 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inaya.ae main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 27.0 kB

  • Original 32.9 kB
  • After minification 24.1 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.8 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 38.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. INAYA images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 150.1 kB

  • Original 208.3 kB
  • After minification 205.2 kB
  • After compression 58.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 150.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 204.9 kB

  • Original 234.0 kB
  • After minification 182.2 kB
  • After compression 29.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inaya.ae needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 204.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (31%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INAYA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inaya.ae

inaya.ae

352 ms

www.inaya.ae.

www.inaya.ae.

541 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

320 ms

style.css

style.css

132 ms

style-responsive.css

style-responsive.css

131 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

147 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

148 ms

cubeportfolio.css

cubeportfolio.css

365 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

463 ms

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js

256 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

172 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

172 ms

placeholder.js

placeholder.js

247 ms

script.js

script.js

245 ms

main.js

main.js

277 ms

Inaya-Logo.jpg

Inaya-Logo.jpg

80 ms

Slider-01_768_400px.jpg

Slider-01_768_400px.jpg

199 ms

Slider-01.jpg

Slider-01.jpg

435 ms

Slider-02.jpg

Slider-02.jpg

511 ms

Slider-03.jpg

Slider-03.jpg

294 ms

Icon02.jpg

Icon02.jpg

71 ms

core-values(1).jpg

core-values(1).jpg

131 ms

Icon01(1).jpg

Icon01(1).jpg

147 ms

02_297_101px.jpg

02_297_101px.jpg

199 ms

04(1)_297_101px.jpg

04(1)_297_101px.jpg

294 ms

Background04(1)_297_101px_297_101px.jpg

Background04(1)_297_101px_297_101px.jpg

260 ms

all.js

all.js

9 ms

facebook.jpg

facebook.jpg

253 ms

twitter.jpg

twitter.jpg

319 ms

google-plus.jpg

google-plus.jpg

318 ms

dropdown.png

dropdown.png

360 ms

slider-mask.png

slider-mask.png

361 ms

border-green.jpg

border-green.jpg

382 ms

x.jpg

x.jpg

381 ms

horizontal-border.jpg

horizontal-border.jpg

438 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

378 ms

slider-larrow.png

slider-larrow.png

384 ms

slider-rarrow.png

slider-rarrow.png

384 ms

ubuntu-l-webfont.woff

ubuntu-l-webfont.woff

438 ms

ubuntu-m-webfont.woff

ubuntu-m-webfont.woff

445 ms

127 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

20 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

29 ms

Accessibility Review

inaya.ae accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

inaya.ae best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

inaya.ae SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inaya.ae can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inaya.ae main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inaya.ae

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INAYA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: