Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

inchbag.com

INCHBAG - INCH Bag - I'm Never Coming Home Bag - Better than a BOB.

Page Load Speed

827 ms in total

First Response

125 ms

Resources Loaded

403 ms

Page Rendered

299 ms

inchbag.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to inchbag.com homepage info - get ready to check INCH Bag best content right away, or after learning these important things about inchbag.com

The INCH Bag or I'm Never Coming Home Bag is better than a BOB. INCH Bag contains all critical survival gear necessary to sustain life for extended periods. See the gear, the firearms, and everything ...

Visit inchbag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inchbag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 702 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inchbag.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inchbag.com

125 ms

hole-173x123.jpg

58 ms

4365a008-8bda-49fe-a728-d82e50e13f4b_1_-416x559.jpg

113 ms

c77bc638-047d-46d2-97b3-ee71546ba59a_1_-130x160.jpg

81 ms

234a9f06-32e5-4bfc-b0d5-499c239d0f43_1_-132x162.jpg

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Inchbag.com, 6% (1 request) were made to Np.lexity.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (226 ms) belongs to the original domain Inchbag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.2 kB (34%)

Content Size

256.1 kB

After Optimization

167.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Inchbag.com main page is 256.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 182.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 38.2 kB

  • Original 47.1 kB
  • After minification 42.8 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 31.3 kB

  • Original 182.2 kB
  • After minification 151.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, INCH Bag needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 26.7 kB
  • After minification 26.7 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INCH Bag. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

inchbag.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

inchbag.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

inchbag.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inchbag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Inchbag.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of INCH Bag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: