5.2 sec in total
597 ms
3.9 sec
739 ms
Visit incoming.bg now to see the best up-to-date Incoming content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about incoming.bg
We are a leading incoming tour operator based in Sofia. We are your best local B2B travel partner experts specialized in: group tours, MICE, business travel, customized services.
Visit incoming.bgWe analyzed Incoming.bg page load time and found that the first response time was 597 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
incoming.bg performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value12.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value1,620 ms
12/100
30%
Value1.832
0/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
597 ms
497 ms
1242 ms
143 ms
274 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Incoming.bg, 34% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Incoming.bg.
Page size can be reduced by 32.7 kB (31%)
106.2 kB
73.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Incoming.bg main page is 106.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 41.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.2 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 163 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Incoming images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 90 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 53 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Incoming.bg has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (37%)
30
19
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Incoming. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
incoming.bg
597 ms
incoming.bg
497 ms
www.incoming.bg
1242 ms
gtm.js
143 ms
1.css
274 ms
css
139 ms
4.css
718 ms
app_home_page.css
703 ms
runtime.js
746 ms
0.js
750 ms
1.js
747 ms
app_layout.js
745 ms
4.js
747 ms
app_home_page.js
748 ms
logo.97e1e6d3.png
787 ms
analytics.js
97 ms
js
454 ms
collect
343 ms
700x466_a48d82d6b3c83c866fd436b1ab044eb3.webp
421 ms
700x466_1557282a60a3c3814464f8f9c11525eb.webp
474 ms
700x466_422d6ce07a85ef38eb111d0e24f95d72.webp
422 ms
700x466_84bcd99ae41a87d2f122a4793fb608b6.webp
421 ms
700x466_dbb49efe2e36b927b33895f5e92fe04b.webp
421 ms
700x466_ede99e9d6b1b4db23a5832235fe168a9.webp
420 ms
700x466_5e64b2020131c52cff7ac46e274aa4c8.webp
664 ms
700x466_5159f05f9e7d943514ed538a505427ce.webp
523 ms
700x466_6bdabfadaf2113730ac12e7804f1b640.webp
524 ms
700x466_537460eb192af480867f52b5b502283f.webp
518 ms
700x466_8f2504403fabe062c9c11a96228f6782.webp
524 ms
700x466_316b7e403086fa93d047161ad173ef0e.webp
640 ms
700x466_8ea996b2f3d0e0e80de8577280dd78bb.webp
662 ms
700x466_62400243eac287160ad43234ccabc969.webp
721 ms
700x466_a39317d0e4659511e8d903eb21f0f93b.webp
735 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8Jow.ttf
372 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K3vXBi8Jow.ttf
372 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8Jow.ttf
394 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nXBi8Jow.ttf
393 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nWBi8Jow.ttf
393 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQBi8Jow.ttf
392 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBi8Jow.ttf
371 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBi8Jow.ttf
371 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K-DQBi8Jow.ttf
378 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
376 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
397 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
397 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
396 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
395 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
398 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
400 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
378 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
380 ms
themify.29b39089.woff
586 ms
fontawesome-webfont.f691f37e.woff
673 ms
incoming.bg accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
incoming.bg best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
incoming.bg SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Incoming.bg can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Incoming.bg main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
incoming.bg
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Incoming. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: